From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] proc: Unmap mmaps of removed files via file->f_mapping
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 21:19:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260725211958.B801E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260725210549.3716546-4-kwilczynski@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] A TOCTOU race allows a newly mmap'd VMA to bypass the zapping process during device rundown, leaving active PTEs mapped to removed hardware.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/3] proc: Unmap mmaps of removed files via file->f_mapping ---
commit d70ab9967b02c9e0d34615bf288a6ac4be654e1f
Author: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@kernel.org>
proc: Unmap mmaps of removed files via file->f_mapping
This commit unmaps user space mappings associated with removable proc
entries when the entry is being removed. It does this by calling
unmap_mapping_file() in close_pdeo() for each open file.
> diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
> --- a/fs/proc/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ static void close_pdeo(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct pde_opener *pdeo)
> spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
>
> file = pdeo->file;
> + if (pde_is_removed(pde))
> + unmap_mapping_file(file);
[Severity: Critical]
Can this race with a concurrent mmap() operation?
Looking at proc_reg_mmap() in fs/proc/inode.c, the PDE usage count is
dropped before the VMA is linked into the address space:
fs/proc/inode.c:proc_reg_mmap() {
...
rv = pde_mmap(pde, file, vma);
unuse_pde(pde);
return rv;
}
If Thread A drops the usage count via unuse_pde(), Thread B's rundown
could proceed and execute unmap_mapping_file() here.
Because Thread A has not yet returned to the VFS layer to link the VMA
to the interval tree:
mm/vma.c:__mmap_new_vma() {
...
vma_link_file(vma, action->hide_from_rmap_until_complete);
...
}
Would unmap_mapping_file() miss this new VMA, allowing Thread A to return
to userspace with an active mapping to the removed device?
> pde->proc_ops->proc_release(file_inode(file), file);
>
> spin_lock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260725210549.3716546-1-kwilczynski@kernel.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-25 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 21:05 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm,kernfs,proc: Unmap mmaps of removed files via file->f_mapping Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-07-25 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: Add unmap_mapping_file() helper Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-07-25 21:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-25 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] kernfs: Unmap mmaps of removed files via file->f_mapping Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-07-25 21:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-25 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] proc: " Krzysztof Wilczyński
2026-07-25 21:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-25 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm,kernfs,proc: " Andrew Morton
2026-07-26 1:22 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260725211958.B801E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox