Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mykola Marzhan" <mykola@meshstor.io>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/12] md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:09:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726120903.67B291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260726113229.2154269-7-mykola@meshstor.io>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unconditional assignment to `wbio->bi_opf` destroys all request flags cloned from the master bio, leading to potential data corruption.
--

--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v6 06/12] md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones ---
commit 333e1430f8770afc53cf111be8c36899e6c4c5e3
Author: Mykola Marzhan <mykola@meshstor.io>

md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones

This commit restores REQ_NOMERGE on P2PDMA retry clones in
narrow_write_error() to prevent member queues from improperly merging
segments.

> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index f07edeac6e5a3..19c4dec450de0 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2561,6 +2561,9 @@ static void narrow_write_error(struct r1bio *r1_bio, int i)
>  		}
>  
>  		wbio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this assignment
unintentionally overwrite all request flags?

Since bio_alloc_clone() copies the original bi_opf, setting it directly to
REQ_OP_WRITE zeroes out the upper 24 flag bits, which drops flags like
REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH.

Could this result in data corruption on power loss if the original write
requested forced unit access?

> +		/* Keep P2PDMA retry bios unmergeable, like the original */
> +		if (md_bio_is_p2pdma(wbio))
> +			wbio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOMERGE;
>  		wbio->bi_iter.bi_sector = r1_bio->sector;
>  		wbio->bi_iter.bi_size = r1_bio->sectors << 9;
>  
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index 5b63175fb3826..428bddddfe71d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2823,6 +2823,9 @@ static void narrow_write_error(struct r10bio *r10_bio, int i)
>  		wbio->bi_iter.bi_sector = wsector +
>  				   choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev);
>  		wbio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE;

[Severity: High]
This is the same pre-existing issue as in raid1.c. Does overwriting bi_opf
drop critical data integrity flags like REQ_FUA cloned from the master bio?

> +		/* Keep P2PDMA retry bios unmergeable, like the original */
> +		if (md_bio_is_p2pdma(wbio))
> +			wbio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOMERGE;
>  
>  		if (submit_bio_wait(wbio) &&
>  		    !rdev_set_badblocks(rdev, wsector, sectors, 0)) {

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260726113229.2154269-1-mykola@meshstor.io?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-26 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-26 11:32 [PATCH v6 00/12] block,md,nvme: correct handling of unsupported P2PDMA transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] block: add BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported peer-to-peer transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] md: ensure REQ_NOMERGE is set on P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] md/raid1: serialize non-write-behind writes on CollisionCheck rdevs Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] md/raid1: don't use write-behind for P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] md/raid1,raid10: factor out raid1_write_error() helper Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:09   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] md/raid1,raid10: skip futile retries on P2PDMA mapping failures Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] md/raid1,raid10: set IO_BLOCKED in case of BLK_STS_P2PDMA Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] nvme-rdma: use ib_dma_map_sgtable_attrs() Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] nvme-rdma: ratelimit the map-failure error message Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] nvme-rdma: factor out the scatterlist DMA mapping helper Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:02   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260726120903.67B291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mykola@meshstor.io \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox