From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix use-after-free of swdma_dev in remove()
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:52:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727195221.C64181F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727181526.9672-9-logang@deltatee.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing check for ioremap() failure in switchtec_dma_create() can cause a null pointer dereference.
- [High] Client callbacks are invoked while holding the channel's `complete_lock`, leading to a self-deadlock if the callback calls DMA engine APIs.
- [High] The channel status IRQ is requested before the `dma_dev->channels` list is initialized, which will cause a NULL pointer dereference if an interrupt fires early.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v3 08/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix use-after-free of swdma_dev in remove() ---
commit 29e71ea6cf1f57028cf682c7cc5c705361a852e2
Author: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix use-after-free of swdma_dev in remove()
This commit fixes a use-after-free of swdma_dev in switchtec_dma_remove().
It caches the bar variable locally before calling
dma_async_device_unregister(), which can synchronously free swdma_dev.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260717223431.625EE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c b/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
> index 800d8ecd07171..d73506b5cabc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does switchtec_dma_create()
check if ioremap() fails?
If ioremap() fails due to resource exhaustion, it returns NULL. The code
appears to immediately dereference this pointer:
drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c:switchtec_dma_create() {
...
swdma_dev->bar = ioremap(pci_resource_start(pdev, 0),
pci_resource_len(pdev, 0));
...
irq = readw(swdma_dev->bar + SWITCHTEC_REG_CHAN_STS_VEC);
...
}
Can this lead to a NULL pointer dereference during device probe?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the driver hold complete_lock while
invoking client callbacks?
In switchtec_dma_cleanup_completed(), the lock is acquired:
drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c:switchtec_dma_cleanup_completed() {
spin_lock_bh(&swdma_chan->complete_lock);
...
dmaengine_desc_get_callback_invoke(&desc->txd, &res);
...
}
The same pattern appears in switchtec_dma_abort_desc().
If the client callback calls back into the DMA engine API (such as
dmaengine_terminate_all()), could this cause a self-deadlock when the
driver attempts to acquire complete_lock again?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it safe to request the channel status
IRQ before the channels list is initialized?
In switchtec_dma_create(), pci_request_irq() is called before the channel
list is populated:
drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c:switchtec_dma_create() {
...
rc = pci_request_irq(pdev, irq, NULL, switchtec_dma_chan_status_isr,
swdma_dev, KBUILD_MODNAME);
...
chan_cnt = switchtec_dma_chans_enumerate(swdma_dev, pdev, chan_cnt);
...
}
If an interrupt fires early, switchtec_dma_chan_status_isr() will iterate
over the uninitialized dma_dev->channels list:
drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c:switchtec_dma_chan_status_isr() {
...
list_for_each_entry(chan, &dma_dev->channels, device_node) {
...
}
Could this loop dereference a NULL pointer and crash if the list head is
completely zeroed before initialization?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727181526.9672-1-logang@deltatee.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 18:15 [PATCH v3 00/11] dmaengine: miscellaneous fixes for ioat, switchtec_dma and plx_dma Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix double-free in switchtec_dma_free_desc() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 18:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 20:42 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix resource leak in alloc_chan_resources Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 18:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 20:44 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: halt channel on alloc_chan_resources error Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 18:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 20:47 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 21:28 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix channel leak on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 20:52 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: make switchtec_dma_chans_release() void Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 19:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 20:54 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix chan_status_irq cleanup on create() error Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 19:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 20:55 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: disable channels before freeing on registration failure Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 19:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 21:21 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 21:51 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: fix use-after-free of swdma_dev in remove() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 19:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27 21:23 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] dmaengine: ioat: disable relaxed ordering before registering the device Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 20:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 21:27 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] dmaengine: ioat: use sysfs_emit() in per-channel sysfs show() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 20:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 21:28 ` Frank Li
2026-07-27 18:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] dmaengine: plx_dma: fix NULL pointer deref in plx_dma_isr() Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-27 20:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 21:29 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727195221.C64181F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox