Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/8] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:06:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728170605.CA6361F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728155308.142713-6-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Leaked workqueue in `i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked()` when `master->ops->request_ibi()` fails.
--

--- Patch [5]: [PATCH V2 5/8] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices ---
commit d69e542b87c33e0789e410767b2ee354fe000c28
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices

This commit adds a check in i3c_device_request_ibi() to ensure a device
reports IBI support before attempting to set up IBI handling. If the device
does not advertise I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP, it now fails with -EOPNOTSUPP.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/device.c b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> index 101eaa77de686..307ca6dc04ca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/device.c
> @@ -205,12 +205,14 @@ int i3c_device_request_ibi(struct i3c_device *dev,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(dev->bus);
> -	if (dev->desc) {
> +	if (!dev->desc) {
> +		ret = -ENOENT;
> +	} else if (!(dev->desc->info.bcr & I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP)) {
> +		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	} else {
>  		mutex_lock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
>  		ret = i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked(dev->desc, req);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() leak the
allocated workqueue if the master's request_ibi callback fails?

Looking at i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() in drivers/i3c/master.c:

	ibi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(i3cdev_to_dev(dev->dev)),
					  WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
	if (!ibi->wq) {
		kfree(ibi);
		return -ENOMEM;
	}
	...
	ret = master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req);
	if (ret) {
		kfree(ibi);
		dev->ibi = NULL;
	}

If master->ops->request_ibi() returns an error, the error path frees ibi
but doesn't call destroy_workqueue(ibi->wq).

If a device probe repeatedly fails at this step, could this result in a
workqueue and memory leak?

>  		mutex_unlock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock);
> -	} else {
> -		ret = -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  	i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(dev->bus);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728155308.142713-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28 15:53 [PATCH V2 0/8] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 19:56     ` Frank Li
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 16:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 20:03   ` Frank Li
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:06   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 20:05   ` Frank Li
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 20:10   ` Frank Li
2026-07-28 15:53 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-07-28 17:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 20:12   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260728170605.CA6361F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox