From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ntb@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] NTB: ntb_transport: Use atomic MW translation groups
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 18:40:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803184022.4C9871F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803180439.1963864-11-den@valinux.co.jp>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing work cancellation in probe error path leads to Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [10]: [PATCH 10/11] NTB: ntb_transport: Use atomic MW translation groups ---
commit 92a31c981341f2c994839699e7b4fa179c125291
Author: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
NTB: ntb_transport: Use atomic MW translation groups
This commit modifies the ntb_transport driver to allocate and program MWs
in a translation group as one contiguous unit. It queries each group,
allocates its backing once, and uses group set and clear operations.
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> index f59f926d4bfaa..2c7728898890c 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1291,6 +1366,22 @@ static int ntb_transport_probe(struct ntb_client *self, struct ntb_dev *ndev)
>
> max_mw_count_for_spads = (spad_count - MW0_SZ_HIGH) / 2;
> nt->mw_count = min(mw_count, max_mw_count_for_spads);
> + if (nt->mw_count) {
> + rc = ntb_mw_get_trans_group(ndev, PIDX, nt->mw_count - 1,
> + &group_first, &group_count);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (group_first < 0 || group_count <= 0 ||
> + (unsigned int)group_first >= nt->mw_count ||
> + (unsigned int)group_count !=
> + nt->mw_count - (unsigned int)group_first) {
> + dev_err(&ndev->dev,
> + "Scratchpad limit splits an MW translation group\n");
> + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
>
> nt->msi_spad_offset = nt->mw_count * 2 + MW0_SZ_HIGH;
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the probe error path need to cancel
link_work?
Looking at ntb_transport_probe(), ntb_set_ctx() registers device callbacks:
rc = ntb_set_ctx(ndev, nt, &ntb_transport_ops);
if (rc)
goto err2;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nt->client_devs);
rc = ntb_bus_init(nt);
if (rc)
goto err3;
If an interrupt fires immediately after ntb_set_ctx() registers the
callbacks, the link_event callback could queue nt->link_work on the system
workqueue.
If ntb_bus_init() subsequently fails, the error path jumps to err3 and
frees the context without explicitly canceling the work via
cancel_delayed_work_sync():
err3:
ntb_clear_ctx(ndev);
err2:
kfree(nt->qp_vec);
err1:
while (i--) {
mw = &nt->mw_vec[i];
iounmap(mw->vbase);
}
kfree(nt->mw_vec);
err:
kfree(nt);
Could this leave link_work queued on freed memory, leading to a
use-after-free when the work queue executes it?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803180439.1963864-1-den@valinux.co.jp?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 18:04 [PATCH 00/11] PCI/NTB: endpoint: packed vNTB memory windows Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 01/11] NTB: Add atomic MW translation group operations Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 02/11] NTB: epf: Parse a versioned packed MW layout Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 03/11] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Add packed MW layout handling Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 04/11] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Implement MW group translation callbacks Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 05/11] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Allocate packed outbound MW space Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 06/11] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Add outbound MW group commands Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 07/11] NTB: epf: Implement MW group translation callbacks Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 08/11] NTB: perf: Reject grouped memory windows Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 09/11] NTB/msi: Require a singleton memory window Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 10/11] NTB: ntb_transport: Use atomic MW translation groups Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 18:04 ` [PATCH 11/11] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Expose packed MWs through configfs Koichiro Den
2026-08-03 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-03 23:00 ` [PATCH 00/11] PCI/NTB: endpoint: packed vNTB memory windows Randy Dunlap
2026-08-04 0:55 ` Koichiro Den
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803184022.4C9871F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox