From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Priyank Rathod" <rathodpriyank@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:20:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803222002.4F6D11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803-b4-fix-aer-memleaks-v2-1-fd199b0171fd@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting memory leak of `aer_regs` in `aer_recover_work_func()` when the associated PCI device is not found.
- [High] Out-of-bounds memory read and ABI layout mismatch when copying and parsing CPER AER payload.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow ---
commit b967f56b707635c965827309db44195cb8cee5ff
Author: Priyank Rathod <rathodpriyank@google.com>
PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow
When ACPI APEI/GHES processes PCIe AER error records, it allocates memory
for aer_capability_regs from ghes_estatus_pool. If kfifo_in_spinlocked()
fails due to a buffer overflow, the allocated memory is not freed. This
commit fixes the leak by calling ghes_estatus_pool_region_free() on the
error path.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index c4fd9c0b2a548..967cde9dd5191 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -1274,9 +1274,12 @@ void aer_recover_queue(int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
> if (kfifo_in_spinlocked(&aer_recover_ring, &entry, 1,
> &aer_recover_ring_lock))
> schedule_work(&aer_recover_work);
> - else
> + else {
> pr_err("buffer overflow in recovery for %04x:%02x:%02x.%x\n",
> domain, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> + ghes_estatus_pool_region_free((unsigned long)aer_regs,
> + sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs));
> + }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while you are fixing memory
leaks of aer_regs from ghes_estatus_pool, there appears to be another
pre-existing leak in the worker function aer_recover_work_func().
If pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() fails to find the PCI device, it executes
a continue statement:
drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c:aer_recover_work_func() {
...
pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(entry.domain, entry.bus,
entry.devfn);
if (!pdev) {
pr_err_ratelimited("%04x:%02x:%02x.%x: no pci_dev found\n",
entry.domain, entry.bus,
PCI_SLOT(entry.devfn),
PCI_FUNC(entry.devfn));
continue;
}
...
ghes_estatus_pool_region_free((unsigned long)entry.regs,
sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs));
}
Does this continue permanently leak entry.regs by skipping the
ghes_estatus_pool_region_free() call at the bottom of the loop?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch interacts with
struct aer_capability_regs allocation, I noticed a potential struct layout
mismatch that could lead to an out-of-bounds read and corrupted hardware
error log parsing.
In drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:ghes_handle_aer(), the CPER payload is copied
using the size of the software structure:
memcpy(aer_info, pcie_err->aer_info, sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs));
However, in include/linux/cper.h, pcie_err->aer_info is strictly a 96-byte
array. struct aer_capability_regs in include/linux/aer.h incorporates
struct pcie_tlp_log (60 bytes), expanding the struct size to 100 bytes and
shifting subsequent hardware fields (such as root_command).
Does this memcpy read 4 bytes past the end of the GHES payload? When
pci_print_aer() subsequently calls pcie_print_tlp_log(), could it read the
hardware Root Error Command register as if it were a TLP prefix, outputting
garbage data?
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(aer_recover_queue);
> #endif
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803-b4-fix-aer-memleaks-v2-0-fd199b0171fd@google.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 21:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI/AER: Fix ghes_estatus_pool memory leaks in error handling Priyank Rathod
2026-08-03 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow Priyank Rathod
2026-08-03 22:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_work_func() when pci_dev is missing Priyank Rathod
2026-08-03 22:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 2:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI/AER: Fix ghes_estatus_pool memory leaks in error handling Priyank Rathod
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260803222002.4F6D11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rathodpriyank@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox