Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Priyank Rathod" <rathodpriyank@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:20:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803222002.4F6D11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803-b4-fix-aer-memleaks-v2-1-fd199b0171fd@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Preexisting memory leak of `aer_regs` in `aer_recover_work_func()` when the associated PCI device is not found.
- [High] Out-of-bounds memory read and ABI layout mismatch when copying and parsing CPER AER payload.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow ---
commit b967f56b707635c965827309db44195cb8cee5ff
Author: Priyank Rathod <rathodpriyank@google.com>

PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow

When ACPI APEI/GHES processes PCIe AER error records, it allocates memory
for aer_capability_regs from ghes_estatus_pool. If kfifo_in_spinlocked()
fails due to a buffer overflow, the allocated memory is not freed. This
commit fixes the leak by calling ghes_estatus_pool_region_free() on the
error path.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index c4fd9c0b2a548..967cde9dd5191 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -1274,9 +1274,12 @@ void aer_recover_queue(int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
>  	if (kfifo_in_spinlocked(&aer_recover_ring, &entry, 1,
>  				 &aer_recover_ring_lock))
>  		schedule_work(&aer_recover_work);
> -	else
> +	else {
>  		pr_err("buffer overflow in recovery for %04x:%02x:%02x.%x\n",
>  		       domain, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> +		ghes_estatus_pool_region_free((unsigned long)aer_regs,
> +					    sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs));
> +	}

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while you are fixing memory
leaks of aer_regs from ghes_estatus_pool, there appears to be another
pre-existing leak in the worker function aer_recover_work_func().

If pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() fails to find the PCI device, it executes
a continue statement:

drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c:aer_recover_work_func() {
        ...
		pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(entry.domain, entry.bus,
						   entry.devfn);
		if (!pdev) {
			pr_err_ratelimited("%04x:%02x:%02x.%x: no pci_dev found\n",
					   entry.domain, entry.bus,
					   PCI_SLOT(entry.devfn),
					   PCI_FUNC(entry.devfn));
			continue;
		}
        ...
        ghes_estatus_pool_region_free((unsigned long)entry.regs,
					    sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs));
}

Does this continue permanently leak entry.regs by skipping the
ghes_estatus_pool_region_free() call at the bottom of the loop?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch interacts with
struct aer_capability_regs allocation, I noticed a potential struct layout
mismatch that could lead to an out-of-bounds read and corrupted hardware
error log parsing.

In drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c:ghes_handle_aer(), the CPER payload is copied
using the size of the software structure:

        memcpy(aer_info, pcie_err->aer_info, sizeof(struct aer_capability_regs));

However, in include/linux/cper.h, pcie_err->aer_info is strictly a 96-byte
array. struct aer_capability_regs in include/linux/aer.h incorporates
struct pcie_tlp_log (60 bytes), expanding the struct size to 100 bytes and
shifting subsequent hardware fields (such as root_command).

Does this memcpy read 4 bytes past the end of the GHES payload? When
pci_print_aer() subsequently calls pcie_print_tlp_log(), could it read the
hardware Root Error Command register as if it were a TLP prefix, outputting
garbage data?

>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(aer_recover_queue);
>  #endif

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803-b4-fix-aer-memleaks-v2-0-fd199b0171fd@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-03 21:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI/AER: Fix ghes_estatus_pool memory leaks in error handling Priyank Rathod
2026-08-03 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_queue() on kfifo buffer overflow Priyank Rathod
2026-08-03 22:20   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-03 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI/AER: Fix memory leak in aer_recover_work_func() when pci_dev is missing Priyank Rathod
2026-08-03 22:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04  2:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI/AER: Fix ghes_estatus_pool memory leaks in error handling Priyank Rathod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803222002.4F6D11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rathodpriyank@google.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox