Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match()
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:37:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807153754.859531F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807145638.168865-8-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The removal of the `i3cdev->desc` NULL check introduces a deterministic NULL pointer dereference in `i3c_device_match` during concurrent driver binding.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete fix: A Use-After-Free of the descriptor is still possible during master unregistration because it executes locklessly.
--

--- Patch [7]: [PATCH V5 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() ---
commit 8aa5de79b60445da0abee6c6a17c70b1b9ec8be9
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match()

i3c_device_match() dereferences i3cdev->desc without holding the bus
normal-use lock.  Since the descriptor pointer can be replaced
concurrently, the dereference can race with descriptor replacement and
result in a use-after-free.

Protect access to i3cdev->desc with the normal-use lock.  While the lock
is held, the descriptor is guaranteed to remain valid, so the NULL check
is also unnecessary and can be removed.

> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index ee771ac0b203e..83e04a2c202a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -347,8 +347,10 @@ static int i3c_device_match(struct device *dev, const struct device_driver *drv)
>  	i3cdev = dev_to_i3cdev(dev);
>  	i3cdrv = drv_to_i3cdrv(drv);
>  
> -	if (i3cdev->desc && i3cdev->desc->boardinfo)
> +	i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(i3cdev->bus);
> +	if (i3cdev->desc->boardinfo)

[Severity: High]
Can removing this NULL check lead to a NULL pointer dereference during
concurrent driver binding?

Looking at master unregistration, the descriptor pointer is cleared
locklessly:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs() {
        ...
        i3cdev->dev->desc = NULL;
        ...
}

If a concurrent sysfs bind operation triggers i3c_device_match(), it might
acquire the read lock but still observe a NULL descriptor since unregistration
does not acquire i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(). Does the removed NULL check
now guarantee a crash in this race condition?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does taking the normal-use lock fully
prevent the use-after-free this patch aims to fix?

Master unregistration modifies and initiates cleanup of descriptors without
acquiring any bus locks, bypassing this protection entirely:

drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_master_bus_cleanup() {
        ...
        i3c_master_detach_free_devs(master);
        ...
}

If a concurrent sysfs bind operation reads i3cdev->desc just before it is
cleared, the read lock here doesn't seem to serialize against the
unregistration thread proceeding to free the descriptor. Can the descriptor
still be freed while i3c_device_match() is dereferencing it?

>  		static_addr_method = i3cdev->desc->boardinfo->static_addr_method;
> +	i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(i3cdev->bus);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * SETAASA-based devices need not always have a matching ID since

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807145638.168865-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07 14:56 [PATCH V5 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 01/14] i3c: master: Fix recursive locking during device registration Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 02/14] i3c: Fix unlocked dereference of dev->desc in i3c_device_get_supported_xfer_mode() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 03/14] i3c: master: Do not treat master device as a duplicate target Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 04/14] i3c: master: Fix use-after-free of master->this Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 05/14] i3c: Make dev->desc locking assumptions explicit Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 06/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_uevent() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 07/14] i3c: master: Fix potential UAF in i3c_device_match() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:37   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 19:43   ` Frank Li
2026-08-08 13:07     ` Alexandre Belloni
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 08/14] i3c: master: Support IBI-based wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 09/14] i3c: master: Report wakeup events for IBIs Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 10/14] i3c: master: Add helper to query bus wakeup requirements Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 12/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci-pci: Propagate I3C wakeup requirements to PCI Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 13/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Factor out i3c_hci_sysdev() Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 14:56 ` [PATCH V5 14/14] i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Advertise IBI wakeup capability Adrian Hunter
2026-08-07 15:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 13:09 ` [PATCH V5 00/14] i3c: Support IBI-based system wakeup Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807153754.859531F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox