Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pranjal Shrivastava" <praan@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:54:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814025428.7754D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814015647.3370124-4-praan@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] Skipping iommu_disable_device_dma() on probe configuration failures leaves the device's DTE dangerously active, leading to memory corruption or IOMMU faults.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A hardware-triggered Peripheral Page Request (PPR) can cause a NULL pointer dereference if the device's IOMMU probe previously failed or was aborted.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping ---
commit e8c6c05e87391c978351a97a7ecc5fb4ef5a2b22
Author: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>

iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping

This commit splits the error paths in amd_iommu_probe_device() to skip
calling iommu_disable_device_dma() on configuration failures. This aims to
preserve the rlookup_table entry required for IRQ remapping.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260529153216.2AD1E1F00899@smtp.kernel.org/

> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> index 91d551f29ed12..9ad3412f0ade8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -2564,6 +2563,10 @@ static struct iommu_device *amd_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>  		goto out_err;
>  	}

[Severity: High]
Does skipping iommu_disable_device_dma() on probe configuration failures
leave the device's Device Table Entry (DTE) dangerously active? 

If the DTE is not properly cleared (e.g., clearing the TV and V bits), could
the AMD hardware continue to intercept DMA using stale or uninitialized state?
This might lead to memory corruption if a kexec environment leaves valid page
tables active, or IOMMU target aborts if a normal boot leaves the page table
root at 0, breaking direct DMA fallback for the device.

>  
> +	return iommu_dev;
> +
> +err_deinit:
> +	iommu_disable_device_dma(iommu, dev);
>  out_err:

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does leaving the DTE active on probe
failures expose a NULL pointer dereference in the hardware PPR handler?

If the hardware generates a Peripheral Page Request (PPR) because the old
kexec PPR configuration was left active, the interrupt handler is called:

drivers/iommu/amd/ppr.c:iommu_call_iopf_notifier() {
    ...
    dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(&pdev->dev);
    if (event.fault.prm.pasid == 0 ||
        event.fault.prm.pasid >= dev_data->max_pasids) {
    ...
}

Since the IOMMU core frees dev->iommu on probe failure, dev_data would be
NULL. Won't unconditionally reading dev_data->max_pasids cause a kernel panic
here?

>  	return iommu_dev;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814015647.3370124-1-praan@google.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14  1:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] iommu/amd: Refactors for ATS robustness Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14  1:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iommu/amd: Refactor device probe and capability initialization Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14  2:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  1:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] iommu/amd: Fix DTE clearing and rename iommu_ignore_device() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14  2:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  1:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14  2:54   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14  1:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/amd: Fail probe on ATS configuration failure Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14  3:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  1:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI/ATS: Mandate checking pci_ats_supported() before pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14  3:11   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814025428.7754D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox