From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Pranjal Shrivastava" <praan@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:54:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814025428.7754D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814015647.3370124-4-praan@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Skipping iommu_disable_device_dma() on probe configuration failures leaves the device's DTE dangerously active, leading to memory corruption or IOMMU faults.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] A hardware-triggered Peripheral Page Request (PPR) can cause a NULL pointer dereference if the device's IOMMU probe previously failed or was aborted.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping ---
commit e8c6c05e87391c978351a97a7ecc5fb4ef5a2b22
Author: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping
This commit splits the error paths in amd_iommu_probe_device() to skip
calling iommu_disable_device_dma() on configuration failures. This aims to
preserve the rlookup_table entry required for IRQ remapping.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260529153216.2AD1E1F00899@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> index 91d551f29ed12..9ad3412f0ade8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2564,6 +2563,10 @@ static struct iommu_device *amd_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> goto out_err;
> }
[Severity: High]
Does skipping iommu_disable_device_dma() on probe configuration failures
leave the device's Device Table Entry (DTE) dangerously active?
If the DTE is not properly cleared (e.g., clearing the TV and V bits), could
the AMD hardware continue to intercept DMA using stale or uninitialized state?
This might lead to memory corruption if a kexec environment leaves valid page
tables active, or IOMMU target aborts if a normal boot leaves the page table
root at 0, breaking direct DMA fallback for the device.
>
> + return iommu_dev;
> +
> +err_deinit:
> + iommu_disable_device_dma(iommu, dev);
> out_err:
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does leaving the DTE active on probe
failures expose a NULL pointer dereference in the hardware PPR handler?
If the hardware generates a Peripheral Page Request (PPR) because the old
kexec PPR configuration was left active, the interrupt handler is called:
drivers/iommu/amd/ppr.c:iommu_call_iopf_notifier() {
...
dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(&pdev->dev);
if (event.fault.prm.pasid == 0 ||
event.fault.prm.pasid >= dev_data->max_pasids) {
...
}
Since the IOMMU core frees dev->iommu on probe failure, dev_data would be
NULL. Won't unconditionally reading dev_data->max_pasids cause a kernel panic
here?
> return iommu_dev;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814015647.3370124-1-praan@google.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 1:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] iommu/amd: Refactors for ATS robustness Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iommu/amd: Refactor device probe and capability initialization Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14 2:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] iommu/amd: Fix DTE clearing and rename iommu_ignore_device() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14 2:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] iommu/amd: Split probe error paths to preserve IRQ remapping Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14 2:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/amd: Fail probe on ATS configuration failure Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14 3:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI/ATS: Mandate checking pci_ats_supported() before pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-08-14 3:11 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814025428.7754D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox