Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Aniket <aniketmaurya@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/ASPM: Clear L1SS capability when L1 latency is unacceptable
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:01:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821140140.652491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821134521.2211943-1-aniketmaurya@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the ASPM sysfs show and store functions (`clkpm_show`, `clkpm_store`, `aspm_attr_show_common`, `aspm_attr_store_common`) fetch the `link_state` pointer locklessly and do not check for NULL before dereferencing it. If function 0 of a multi-function PCIe device is removed via hotplug or sysfs, `pcie_aspm_exit_link_state()` frees the parent bridge's `link_state`. Subsequent reads or writes to the ASPM sysfs attributes of remaining functions (e.g., function 1) will dereference a NULL pointer. If a sysfs write races with the removal of function 0, it results in a Use-After-Free.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] PCI/ASPM: Clear L1SS capability when L1 latency is unacceptable ---
commit 484f6a2751436d7940ad4ac7d04ecc20b6162859
Author: Aniket <aniketmaurya@google.com>

PCI/ASPM: Clear L1SS capability when L1 latency is unacceptable

This commit updates pcie_aspm_check_latency() to clear PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1SS
from link->aspm_capable when L1 exit latency is unacceptable. This prevents
exposing L1SS sysfs control files when the link cannot use L1. Additionally,
it updates pcie_config_aspm_link() to check link->aspm_support to ensure L1
PM Substates are properly cleared in hardware if they were left enabled.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 172783e7f519a..b2660892972a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c

[ ... ]

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the ASPM sysfs show and store
functions fetch the link_state pointer locklessly and do not check for NULL
before dereferencing it.

drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:aspm_attr_show_common() {
    ...
	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
	struct pcie_link_state *link = pcie_aspm_get_link(pdev);

	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", (link->aspm_enabled & state) ? 1 : 0);
}

Does this code risk a NULL pointer dereference?

If function 0 of a multi-function PCIe device is removed via hotplug or sysfs,
pcie_aspm_exit_link_state() frees the parent bridge's link_state.

If an unprivileged user then reads an ASPM sysfs file on a remaining function
(like function 1), pcie_aspm_get_link() will return NULL, causing an
unconditional dereference here.

[Severity: High]
Additionally, could a concurrent sysfs write result in a use-after-free?

drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c:clkpm_store() {
    ...
	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
	struct pcie_link_state *link = pcie_aspm_get_link(pdev);
	bool state_enable;

	if (kstrtobool(buf, &state_enable) < 0)
		return -EINVAL;

	down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
	mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);

	link->clkpm_disable = !state_enable;
    ...
}

If a sysfs write races with the removal of function 0, the link pointer is
fetched locklessly before taking aspm_lock.

If the removal completes and frees the link before the lock is acquired, the
write operation will dereference freed memory.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821134521.2211943-1-aniketmaurya@google.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 13:45 [PATCH v2] PCI/ASPM: Clear L1SS capability when L1 latency is unacceptable Aniket
2026-08-21 14:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 18:05   ` Aniket .

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821140140.652491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=aniketmaurya@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox