From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79D2639B94F; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787322844; cv=none; b=aE++q5DVDEPDcDX3c+ke3OdD9Xu0bPVU2ICOgG9TxxaMUnGigpDvsQacW8YarOO838huTtrfG6bowth4mYisMjn2rb/TW6mYHm3nw+Njtj5iGXuOYcKJFubdpPv9bDrgkaIrYv0n6+R1udR1WiZxoISzxFVcEQ028r3QoV39fEg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787322844; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gOVy9g2LFtuQkdaxGJKsch+hvSaOzXCuwhECKdW5Hio=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=RYa/ywWadiUE2IcwcIKfgJW3bH1pvcD26gNcYe6l0raGSdSOEwTv9OIcVaVw5zV/LZxWzYNIOX2W0ynkmv70XUomB8WT4ujsVT0jzD657t6oZh7dhNrzbsb+zCTejd+2Ei+AWEUjZ/8GMYAArLtlQvB5SGFtV9gc7ZP70T0hTAA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lLLAAq+S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lLLAAq+S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E869E1F000E9; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:34:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787322843; bh=gOVy9g2LFtuQkdaxGJKsch+hvSaOzXCuwhECKdW5Hio=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=lLLAAq+SQarWE6SX30FR2ITZqu8yXqoytHSvuXmjaeqB7GEqxnj2CO+HXKqfQWP6u pUC/cGURUeUH0CgpYg46GoIr2BQEVuNXvN0ohOQKh1V3HW+LdNmtCi5ZrdQp5OJxRI ib38CWQp0GFPR3OkStxixxSa03mXZ7r/7reNmq8A0hIgZjXAHU3ARCtOUcoEJid1d9 Sc8DpS3lMnDLVu4QoyxWfB6FE+It0MtgJ1UCX0HNUXUlu0sHUv/7iCyUjGYX6311Yk EM/ogR9/pk3bL6DC18l6BxOtgY68bvAAFEN7ZjyhDJzSyzJmrP3G03pFognun6rduX QWhH7VjzZD0nA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] PCI: Link a virtual function to its physical function Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "David Jeffery" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260821142414.150892-8-djeffery@redhat.com> References: <20260821142414.150892-1-djeffery@redhat.com> <20260821142414.150892-8-djeffery@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:34:02 +0000 Message-Id: <20260821143402.E869E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > With a PCI virtual function having the same bus for its parent > as the physical function it is associated with, there is no > explicit dependency between the two in the device tree. With > async shutdown, this can result in the PF being shutdown before the > VF has an opportunity to shutdown. >=20 > Link the VF as a consumer of the PF to note its dependency and > ensure clean shutdown ordering. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Tarun Sahu > Signed-off-by: David Jeffery Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821142414.1508= 92-1-djeffery@redhat.com?part=3D7