Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sahil Chandna" <sahilchandna@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Warn when wait_for_response() waits indefinitely
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 05:30:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260825053015.B26731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260825051850.2438816-1-sahilchandna@linux.microsoft.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Use-After-Free on Error Path for VMbus Completion Packets
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] PCI: hv: Warn when wait_for_response() waits indefinitely ---
commit 7a3f315fe3798f61aaba375b4ed84ec32d84ef0f
Author: Sahil Chandna <sahilchandna@linux.microsoft.com>
PCI: hv: Warn when wait_for_response() waits indefinitely

This commit adds a periodic warning to wait_for_response() if the guest waits
too long for a rescind message or packet completion. This makes indefinite hangs
visible in the guest's kernel log so they can be correlated with host-side state.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hyperv/20260612174010.2598695-1-hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com/

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index cfc8fa403dad6..c4fba00391649 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
[ ... ]
>  static int wait_for_response(struct hv_device *hdev,
>  			     struct completion *comp)
>  {
> +	unsigned long delay = secs_to_jiffies(PCI_RESPONSE_HANG_TIMEOUT_SEC);
> +	u64 timeout = get_jiffies_64() + delay;
> +
>  	while (true) {
>  		if (hdev->channel->rescind) {
>  			dev_warn_once(&hdev->device, "The device is gone.\n");
>  			return -ENODEV;

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this early return on rescind lead to a
use-after-free for the completion packets?

When wait_for_response() detects hdev->channel->rescind and returns -ENODEV,
callers like hv_read_config_block() will immediately return and unwind their
stack:

drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c:hv_read_config_block() {
    ...
    ret = wait_for_response(hbus->hdev, &comp_pkt.comp_pkt.host_event);
    if (ret)
        return ret;
    ...
}

This pops the stack frame containing the completion context without
deregistering the request. If a late completion packet arrives, wouldn't
hv_pci_onchannelcallback() retrieve the dangling pointer and execute the
invalid completion function?

drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c:hv_pci_onchannelcallback() {
    ...
            comp_packet = (struct pci_packet *)req_addr;
            response = (struct pci_response *)buffer;
            ...
            comp_packet->completion_func(comp_packet->compl_ctxt,
                                         response,
                                         bytes_recvd);
    ...
}

Could this result in memory corruption or a control-flow hijack if the
hypervisor sends a completion packet after the rescind offer, but before
the channel is completely closed?

>  		}
>  
>  		if (wait_for_completion_timeout(comp, HZ / 10))
>  			break;
[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260825051850.2438816-1-sahilchandna@linux.microsoft.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-25  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25  5:17 [PATCH] PCI: hv: Warn when wait_for_response() waits indefinitely Sahil Chandna
2026-08-25  5:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-25 12:03   ` Sahil Chandna
2026-08-25  6:46 ` Naman Jain
2026-08-25 12:00   ` Sahil Chandna
2026-08-25 17:00   ` Long Li
2026-08-27 16:07     ` Michael Kelley
2026-08-27 17:34       ` Saurabh Singh Sengar
2026-08-28  5:40         ` Naman Jain
2026-08-28 14:59           ` Hamza Mahfooz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260825053015.B26731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sahilchandna@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox