From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1558E3ACEF7 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788093260; cv=none; b=Ovyk03nwhVrf8yOnJsXDrgP6LTclFrpBcGbnrSei7sN1UNXheJUtIPP+BZbuA0LgX7gXDjosr0hFz3OBBNANM0/7mN52jcp7B8Ltf6Ypk5o5w49RSXTj5yrhbgfMIcgMyseBFqzm/suuPlyFzsYURgHHEXRhZvmu1sYukuW+KZo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788093260; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f76UOAz1THYiLFWjxR64iI63dgAFMOq7QkyjQYHPHhM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=BOjfxw39zIj7+g28oPd/cZfJrfYDHZ4vs0yrzO47SUFuncSuySGcqgihLftbNitZtRo7G8In4sYkf82FXBBZOFGqAN/LP7BR8XblgfVrGBkP9QUXxhxtxeRp9QoLui0v9+JDPrqeUE0k70nFWbvK9q5t3OVG4QxbBhRIE8iNdjA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=b32pTxlA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b32pTxlA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA2FA1F000E9; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:34:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788093259; bh=f76UOAz1THYiLFWjxR64iI63dgAFMOq7QkyjQYHPHhM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=b32pTxlABkYLl3zMgll0LLmKs64+lkOYSZAbCN90f0RRufHwrlQ3p2khDZl417WkT OKcDM5EExWNSZw6S6mDF8mFRkNVomx40SBKgE7d8b5kB3iSeHHUgUMx5N9b4yxkNOz FFHIVTooNuongPN5iaCfvqZehKDWg4Rjf1qkmi60GinuilaV9tkC5i0mxizKBYguTt KX40a4wgJ+I0qdjondPXfn01dz24qvWu8iDhVNuEhaJNYvAnihmyuSZDkxbMrDUu3Y XNQqZbLfiJMhjs/K8FXcDu9nMYVgzwM3xb655/O9N+JJOoxz5EMFLAspm1nEoBbOXk dkmP1sd0kfX1g== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/P2PDMA: Update DMABUF lifecycle docs after move_notify() rename Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Leon Romanovsky" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260830-doc-p2p-move-v1-1-61a388620588@nvidia.com> References: <20260830-doc-p2p-move-v1-1-61a388620588@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 12:34:18 +0000 Message-Id: <20260830123418.DA2FA1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Leon Romanovsky >=20 > Commit 95308225e5ba ("dma-buf: Rename dma_buf_move_notify() to > dma_buf_invalidate_mappings()") left the DMABUF section of the P2PDMA > documentation pointing at move_notify(), a symbol that no longer > exists. Readers grepping for it find nothing, and this is the only > place in Documentation/ describing the revocation requirement. >=20 > Name the current function and record that importers which cannot unmap > within bounded time have to be rejected at attach time, which is what > makes the synchronous unmap on remove() achievable. >=20 > Fixes: 95308225e5ba ("dma-buf: Rename dma_buf_move_notify() to dma_buf_in= validate_mappings()") > Reviewed-by: Christian K=C3=B6nig > Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830-doc-p2p-mo= ve-v1-1-61a388620588@nvidia.com?part=3D1