From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 933F9476055; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788369440; cv=none; b=RWTKLSlGaBIIAeDzR1xn5pc4l2OcbgGKV4Ei+SZcNmiqSEpYX05TEenc/RnBR9fOK2lKrvi1zIRdXxS8cqKu1vyl5P/VGHyIR8sFt4EsNuh0m2CbhnoYFoYVkn66SjOFwkkN4QSOrr3UWlppZZuGLqTacNM4jypIFuNUoxT//Lw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788369440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o2Mv7WRrpwA7jgMetkVKrbR3crOX5CzXQPI21Zi2wMM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=oRCEq27BRE7qkqCyKPdIAjnt9bmZWnD4Wd5BJDRqZmy2HQt1piPy0BQrnvt6cmWkQ6pS+xtM8gn0D9hudPgKa+W36vcSf2q/6uXZtu2xA7pPgJGtfUr0ZAXVhjgQokVLiUaVoM8b6YhgP03FX57QsPRKs5L+63oO6XMtLjO692c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OW9JwkVP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OW9JwkVP" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 010FE1F000E9; Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:17:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788369439; bh=o2Mv7WRrpwA7jgMetkVKrbR3crOX5CzXQPI21Zi2wMM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=OW9JwkVPNE3PyDLTKkEJueitferbFrJtrSCD/+Scydlci/lDUSgw0RwmGNosra2lv VSlvjBbpPKf5EyXkclq6l4erX5492OcUdx/DijX5YRXsQk0Zdgf6qG3AauvnxLMSiE FAkPDr2xWbyyl2u08pBh6hrrC+UDOdjLVRWNCSzyKEVzoiaH7ghpkTaczqjxH4roNo grbPNZQzY6+zIHhVAjV77Y8/t3GeMwAWJmS9crpPkpmtrMugDcgIl2g+JfmDvZir5V Xh/lcl9WsWBBs0x5OJ8sF3k2Gs6G1ngZMNPPB0wieFaxLau+tlYn4pGHN64MRYSTMj c7gvCegsYql6w== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] PCI: Link a virtual function to its physical function Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "David Jeffery" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260902170734.95504-8-djeffery@redhat.com> References: <20260902170734.95504-1-djeffery@redhat.com> <20260902170734.95504-8-djeffery@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 17:17:18 +0000 Message-Id: <20260902171719.010FE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > With a PCI virtual function having the same bus for its parent > as the physical function it is associated with, there is no > explicit dependency between the two in the device tree. With > async shutdown, this can result in the PF being shutdown before the > VF has an opportunity to shutdown. >=20 > Link the VF as a consumer of the PF to note its dependency and > ensure clean shutdown ordering. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Tarun Sahu > Signed-off-by: David Jeffery Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902170734.9550= 4-1-djeffery@redhat.com?part=3D7