From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI: dwc: Force L2 link entry on shutdown/reboot without D3cold check
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 01:01:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905010153.BA95D1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260905-shutdown-v5-2-f0c6bafa1d4f@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Functions in the dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() call path use sleeping functions like read_poll_timeout() and ioremap() in a noirq atomic context, leading to kernel panics.
--
commit dcb22ca0634090a97fec1c0ad3528317b8e40f06
Author: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>
PCI: dwc: Force L2 link entry on shutdown/reboot without D3cold check
dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() normally calls pci_host_common_d3cold_possible()
to check whether every downstream endpoint can be put into D3cold before
bothering to move the link to L2. If no endpoint supports it, the
function returns early and leaves the link up. This patch adds a
force_d3cold flag to force this behavior.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index f5a38e6fd8d79..a8a3861c29560 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -1224,14 +1224,15 @@ static int dw_pcie_pme_turn_off(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>
> int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> {
> - bool pme_capable = false;
> + bool d3cold, pme_capable = false;
> int ret = 0;
> u32 val;
>
> if (!dw_pcie_link_up(pci))
> goto stop_link;
>
> - if (!pci_host_common_d3cold_possible(pci->pp.bridge, &pme_capable))
> + d3cold = pci_host_common_d3cold_possible(pci->pp.bridge, &pme_capable);
> + if (!d3cold && !pci->pp.force_d3cold)
> return 0;
>
> if (pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off) {
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the path continuing past
this check lead to a kernel panic in an atomic noirq context?
If we do not return early here, dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() can call
dw_pcie_pme_turn_off(), which dynamically maps memory from a context where
interrupts are disabled:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c:dw_pcie_pme_turn_off() {
...
mem = ioremap(pci->pp.msg_res->start, pci->region_align);
...
}
Functions like ioremap() take locks and use GFP_KERNEL allocations which can
sleep.
Furthermore, dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() then calls read_poll_timeout():
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c:dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() {
...
ret = read_poll_timeout(dw_pcie_get_ltssm, val,
val == DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_IDLE ||
val <= DW_PCIE_LTSSM_DETECT_WAIT,
PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US, false, pci);
...
}
The read_poll_timeout() macro invokes usleep_range() when the sleep parameter
is non-zero, requiring timer interrupts to be enabled.
In an atomic noirq context, this causes a scheduling while atomic panic or
system deadlock because local interrupts are disabled and scheduling is
forbidden.
Should read_poll_timeout_atomic() be used here instead, and can the ioremap()
call be avoided during noirq suspend?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260905-shutdown-v5-0-f0c6bafa1d4f@oss.qualcomm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-05 0:48 [PATCH v5 0/3] PCI: qcom: Implement shutdown() to avoid SMMU/NoC errors on reboot Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-09-05 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] PCI: host-common: Fix early bus-walk exit in d3cold_possible() Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-09-05 0:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] PCI: dwc: Force L2 link entry on shutdown/reboot without D3cold check Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-09-05 1:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-05 0:48 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] PCI: qcom: Implement shutdown() callback Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2026-09-05 1:03 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260905010153.BA95D1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox