From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jim Quinlan" <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk 32BIT_PCI_OPS
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:47:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911234702.F286F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911233541.1650895-8-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unconditional teardown in brcm_pcie_remove on pci_host_probe failure causes UAF or NULL pointer dereference.
--
commit d3ea9196e71b4fdf62dbbe06f00b5b226f406396
Author: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk 32BIT_PCI_OPS
Declare a new quirk that indicates SoCs where the config-space accesses are
restricted to 32bit R/W.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> index 8927d1d97f4a8..be414d3468555 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2180,8 +2182,8 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> - bridge->ops = pcie->cfg->soc_base == BCM7425 ?
> - &brcm7425_pcie_ops : &brcm_pcie_ops;
> + bridge->ops = BQUIRK(pcie, 32BIT_PCI_OPS)
> + ? &brcm_pcie_ops32 : &brcm_pcie_ops;
> bridge->sysdata = pcie;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this probe error path have
a use-after-free?
Right after the modified code in brcm_pcie_probe(), we have this error path:
ret = pci_host_probe(bridge);
if (!ret && !brcm_pcie_link_up(pcie))
ret = -ENODEV;
if (ret) {
brcm_pcie_remove(pdev);
return ret;
}
If pci_host_probe() returns an error, it has already cleaned up and freed
bridge->bus.
When we then call brcm_pcie_remove(pdev), it unconditionally accesses the
freed pointer:
pci_lock_rescan_remove();
pci_stop_root_bus(bridge->bus);
pci_remove_root_bus(bridge->bus);
pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
Can this cause a kernel panic on device probe failure?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260911233541.1650895-1-james.quinlan@broadcom.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-11 23:35 [PATCH 00/13] PCI: brcmstb: Stop using chip numbers for conditions Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 01/13] PCI: brcmstb: Remove redundant const specifier for struct fields Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 02/13] PCI: brcmstb: Use flags u32 instead of bools Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 03/13] PCI: brcmstb: Add Broadcom quirks macro Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 04/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk OB_WIN_32BIT_ADDR Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 05/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk OB_WIN_MAXSZ_128MB Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 06/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign flag IS_BMIPS Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 07/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk 32BIT_PCI_OPS Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 08/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk NO_RGR1_TIMER Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 09/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk EARLY_PERST_ASSERT Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 10/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk PERST_PCIE_REV_CUTOFF Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 11/13] PCI: brcmstb: Put max_burst_size setting in cfg_data Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 12/13] PCI: brcmstb: Use order-0 indexing for inbound BAR window array Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 13/13] PCI: brcmstb: Split up complicated function into two variants Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:54 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911234702.F286F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox