From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wei.liu@kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: hv: hardwire PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN to 0
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:34:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260913233451.95D691F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913232255.2801797-1-wei.liu@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Directly modifying a u32 buffer via a char pointer cast assumes Little Endian memory layout, clearing the wrong byte and corrupting adjacent registers on Big Endian architectures.
- [Medium] The patch hardwires PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN to 0 for 16/32-bit reads but completely ignores PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, creating an inconsistent configuration space state.
--
commit badaaf9419fe573b12895ca135de8cb0ded77d3e
Author: Mukesh R <mrathor@linux.microsoft.com>
PCI: hv: hardwire PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN to 0
Hyper-V DDA does not support legacy interrupts, so the driver intercepts
8-bit configuration reads to hardwire PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN to 0. This commit
attempts to also hardwire the pin for 16-bit and 32-bit reads, which
previously bypassed the emulation and leaked host hardware values.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index 89816a2bd7cd3..bb4e6ca4ac1ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -1240,6 +1240,16 @@ static void _hv_pcifront_read_config(struct hv_pci_dev *hpdev, int where,
> mb();
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->config_lock, flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN is hard-wired to 0, since it
> + * may be read using a 32bit read, which is skipped by the
> + * above emulation.
> + */
> + if (where <= PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN &&
> + PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN < (where + size))
[Severity: Medium]
Will this leave PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE leaking host hardware state on 16-bit
and 32-bit reads?
The original code correctly hardwires both PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE and
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN to 0 for 8-bit reads. By only checking and clearing
PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN here, a 16-bit or 32-bit read starting at
PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE will bypass the emulation and return the raw host
hardware legacy configuration to the guest.
> + *((char *)val + PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN - where) = 0;
[Severity: High]
Could this corrupt adjacent configuration registers on big-endian
architectures?
This pointer cast directly modifies the memory backing the u32 val buffer.
Because a u32 is stored in CPU native endianness, treating it as a char
array assumes a little-endian layout.
On a big-endian guest, the computed byte offset will point to the wrong byte
in the u32, such as clearing PCI_MIN_GNT instead of PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN. This
would leave the intended pin unmodified while corrupting another register.
> +
> } else {
> dev_err(dev, "Attempt to read beyond a function's config space.\n");
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260913232255.2801797-1-wei.liu@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-13 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 23:22 [PATCH v2] PCI: hv: hardwire PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN to 0 wei.liu
2026-09-13 23:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-25 2:18 ` Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260913233451.95D691F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox