From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9304EE873 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789562716; cv=none; b=lLfwQgiTxkHCrXOQtjgUxNQ9SMEB0TgINRpe83GWbgssPx4HlmLM8ARuFvjoP9jTvOlur10Qy86cfOlEb9iJg9ZCdDJ6rX6B+MHmqXWZr3UvJtKI63nCs/hi7UFTJ46cXEx1YDpctR+rQK+ihpxiimqougLgVcPappAzI+VqQfA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789562716; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eb7iXZP92U+EwXgtjBRQPHDjoxuEPDz1gjyS7C+KhOE=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=LlC5P8D/NvvFmEDqyBSlPdGLQde9mFjMy5zrcj00BG9zog+YIpiXuevalpAhdMe09MfWmqpKnuw2JXcgwpwISyUGZTEzp0/czxn+FEs/FSs6E2DvJ8JKwy1PJn9NBopQ1IJ9io+dBhaBQ3PdTOHFsr+BL4Tb5RVpkcp5PqB5t9g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Uph+o4YA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Uph+o4YA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBD8A1F000FF; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:45:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789562713; bh=eb7iXZP92U+EwXgtjBRQPHDjoxuEPDz1gjyS7C+KhOE=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Uph+o4YAX0bRoP3M78LCZAFzzOmRnemVV1daQlPlb3ntpthlPaTI7K0XrZaQA5nnI T5UGLhHNGi/ZZSRm9UR4gEdDbUdMqJo/h3ZaY7klZosxoVeo4R3xiQp7zdCgvFnvWL mbm1EYu0Da7oL4b1NlRwExMU/FyvfyU/0lMloZhwgv2R1Ps421iK8KZxgECKrzbaOO vE4QIPy5+z+lCH9ghsFFdrKTOKNd9SCg3H0z54I2ja9lsLlQLVzleWcuXgutH/VQ35 xsPSAi47AixN7tc3Gw73oLxV040+jrk5CtIUicOa3rQPc1z1Io8JHN1Escjt3RWZsU jymZ9ngviCc2A== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom: Ignore -ENODEV after Root Port reset Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Konrad Dybcio" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260916-topic-pcie_portrec_enodev-v1-1-5dc7bde39552@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260916-topic-pcie_portrec_enodev-v1-1-5dc7bde39552@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:45:13 +0000 Message-Id: <20260916124513.BBD8A1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Root Port recovery may race with a device hot-unplug. In that case, > dw_pcie_wait_for_link() returns -ENODEV because no device is detected > after the controller has been successfully reset. >=20 > This is a valid outcome and should not cause Root Port recovery to > fail. Ignore -ENODEV while continuing to propagate other link-training > errors. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Fixes: 4d88cb82a6d9 ("PCI: qcom: Implement .reset_root_port() and use for= link down") > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916-topic-pcie= _portrec_enodev-v1-1-5dc7bde39552@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3D1