From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5852248F010; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789990261; cv=none; b=D4Fp9001XtRTaJFJWSFjSqyxBL56frdaZoYwrgqTxG++Bndq0FJmsc8C9OzpdJLW5dPeTrQJgqmtsEoD8vOY/munJc2mfznqpqvMyzENLVou50D1R6FR7bvtFMEkjG8n5hQjJqT+TnMMKpjzIGLoOAOWHgCGdLsT/INCGwAIn5o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789990261; c=relaxed/simple; bh=reX35WPOw8SQVnDpR4qqsiOje7vbBxcXR/izIjNIKL8=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=GQjAFwZt6haMW8Ep9VMY+e7QOXVsIMh6tTWDM1xzYfzbbpT8NYacllMbVGTVWFNjzTdeX7Wo6gset5g4meYQd/U0H2XcQzFMV3Bap9YjtiFz7PyMaARId7iV2Le6UwEerG5IizmVevaX5/NW+eetOSgWJsabYIoXNP7xObkyDCI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=E6AHqRmK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="E6AHqRmK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D1D81F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:30:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789990257; bh=reX35WPOw8SQVnDpR4qqsiOje7vbBxcXR/izIjNIKL8=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=E6AHqRmKjcZWV1Wdscb2SmTIbZfcIeIyO+U3lmN3+y5/bddByyvF8/Xk1MZlsHROv W9+fSXLDoV9mYaoCDt1L8OpzcQGJlCI2/WK7GGriB8ADI/HS5dGG1iVnHPIDfgt9mG VgPosvAHvDztkDGF2i3++Hhoq/jFtrBb2Jt9kjU4p2Z7XLFJ21xlnVbCQzFH7k0GWS OjpXg50bquZs7JYStqmPf9rRpVo6LXtlYzwfN82wDERG184WSVjezYcjKyTTO7Dtts sQf/HFwMW/nG3iK1sg47fIQssxQ/hkKUc+66tbYN0sL3+Y+GHlNvBO412fMzogQDYK bpu/nWdqdzb8A== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: qcom: monaco: Fix pcie1_phy compatible to list qcs8300 first Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: <20260921-monaco_ep-v1-5-63c5282fb0db@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260921-monaco_ep-v1-0-63c5282fb0db@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260921-monaco_ep-v1-5-63c5282fb0db@oss.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:30:57 +0000 Message-Id: <20260921113057.8D1D81F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The existing pcie1_phy node only listed qcom,sa8775p-qmp-gen4x4-pcie-phy > compatible, since no QCS8300-specific compatible was documented for this > PHY at the time. >=20 > Now that qcom,qcs8300-qmp-gen4x4-pcie-phy is documented, list it first > with qcom,sa8775p-qmp-gen4x4-pcie-phy as its fallback, matching the > order used by the pcie0_ep and pcie1_ep nodes. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260921-monaco_ep-= v1-0-63c5282fb0db@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3D5