From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC19F42FCA1; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790067392; cv=none; b=AhkZwcRKDxj/EUlSxD/srUFbGlWN6nig7TeN7i2atUc5Z1syAe+2TfLzkN5D0bXgXYYMaAmvGIPIZCZn5vP0TlxqOsDflSlKwLvNBFohV0pcE6Pz8V7/ysWX2JJhS4fjGMGhAXPGQuio5lD2IIZJWb+AWQenFf7UgMISxpneVG8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790067392; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6eYSqkDMxx/4serteT3xEkbRZV0WQNEQBE8vpj8TcdA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=KZpTlCRu1JQ1SzVk1Ijm02l7C3pt9Sd0yJqY1Eu27i2H6t7VNLaUSEgkQyAivXyjhxBTWOMDIxJqh1gvQdPnJO2/c47mmzt+63ka3UJpQfSWpPVUx7s2DE4CJ8AL/BCIbncxXQG2lczLFcx8sPvFy4rR1/N3ptM9GgF2mGCw4aY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LjSdBWCg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LjSdBWCg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C35B1F0089B; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:56:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790067390; bh=6eYSqkDMxx/4serteT3xEkbRZV0WQNEQBE8vpj8TcdA=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=LjSdBWCgeR5va5pPbJLM5iH6xgx7NeLl2lXx8v4tusqukKXt0AoRxAidAXryQRLj4 sF9vxFbpT0uAa/L1pzP4QzdFrTohWbcVf2kvpJsgnZDBvFOcuXuSyNNo1ZNAYi8dVH k8CXGOwZAGfU4DVuZqGi22TZOZLB/OLn8BC6g2WEHPNYI2B0vEIAOA/mL5NxC+d3Mf 4NL394ZAOocO4k3e5Y3QP2GL3X2yLOCYqd7MG+lC10okqHSs3S1kelGuhP+2UIU6Ot ZpbEyKhGZfxuvMYeIQ56FA+NcvDmj4Lb4c2m0VkWNm665amyjSnRiiTLob+0zJdQ/B uhCMuRV1ZTHeQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 12/15] PCI/CXL: Reject reset with unsafe function scope Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Srirangan Madhavan" Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260922083924.2451158-13-smadhavan@nvidia.com> References: <20260922083924.2451158-1-smadhavan@nvidia.com> <20260922083924.2451158-13-smadhavan@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:56:30 +0000 Message-Id: <20260922085630.7C35B1F0089B@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The per-device PCI reset interface must not reset sibling functions. > Reject cxl_reset and cxl_bus for multifunction devices and PFs with > enabled VFs. >=20 > Reported-by: Alex Williamson > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260626160846.426e71b6@nvidia.co= m/ > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/6a50441e2bb5e_3cabcb1003e@djbw-de= v.notmuch/ > Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922083924.2451= 158-1-smadhavan@nvidia.com?part=3D12