From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D8B33A9FE for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790274609; cv=none; b=qJrIVPf0hq5MC1EIJyR2DKc+8oIAvePAII2lnU6921GBrsOQ2swlF9JDNCJV4QYXTaE/+KU2O/RB4967Q4ZUQFOLErilZEu/ySMN2vK6GujaL47ZMvQKC1KRg/Rp9dIIA46kiwboW5NjzAxkMekn+EnFVuHSgB3YAlSkFy5O26Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790274609; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EmmlIT9U5S20/xblppYmuY/L90VatEwJDKsNpvjdq6I=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=pu5fUI5/B4zehs+uWKGsiozYiNT4uob7b9w7l0QH1RGFc2TUqF5szRnqIRK35vvb4rjJw1gz6WRiOA7fk62S3WXEe3hkK7vPWe0GJJKdK08aUcUC2SpEeEnfW3z4n48cF03Vcjldasn8AQmPNvoNbLy5ecXImIBDLJqUbXSABAU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=e6N61WBZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="e6N61WBZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFBE21F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:30:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790274607; bh=EmmlIT9U5S20/xblppYmuY/L90VatEwJDKsNpvjdq6I=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=e6N61WBZFbaMZ0XhEDK6haI5Ya1IIaQhus2OZvaVtDaJM3eGSLWyTcvGrMg9iANPg qwQ0KSPDoUODtMzxX6dDOvjO5W1s36Hkwp/V00J8aLkFkpQdPQZZd7l+3o4iX8ouRq aNH0Fs/B9/J54+nOZm5H+n24GtVhXkOZHpdVV8De3TJQzc7nOCcnb9rMgrcwfLPVg3 f/y710SDRSbFS0z+y8Bc0kmFuhzYmG8M1mw+DMJ4+BhpW8wMAj7Fjpyotf8Ngq9bCd E71v2H9BMRURvj3iGry+CaZeo6XcVH0Iqmm4ynlbWkUY9XqUMOu4Y/qUfmpg9vDtP9 jGT+o+nfEb1Mw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] PCI/PTM: Save PTM state in the saved capability store Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "David Matlack" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260924173501.856380-10-dmatlack@google.com> References: <20260924173501.856380-1-dmatlack@google.com> <20260924173501.856380-10-dmatlack@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 18:30:06 +0000 Message-Id: <20260924183006.EFBE21F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Save and restore the PTM Control register through the per-device saved > capability store instead of a private pci_cap_saved_state buffer. >=20 > Report a reservation failure. pci_ptm_init() ignored the return value of > pci_add_ext_cap_save_buffer() entirely, so a failed allocation was only > noticed later as silently missing PTM state. >=20 > No functional change intended. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: David Matlack Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924173501.8563= 80-1-dmatlack@google.com?part=3D9