From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2BA3AEF57; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790850677; cv=none; b=cecGdsRpKJRUTO6Rp/7AbB9kLdCxqOeHytdgDAUIhU0P6NGyOkoG2AmoZyq+mErrgutubgCvSleYPihSQgkuzlNO8r1UU4YhItAFYa1HEWFmfbcwndHk5+URJRElqxyj3/L0/K3wnDjY7FaRceWCp4zpBkyKSkdGvin0xrrYk9c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790850677; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7ppqlQBPRreQgaQbXc0wgcQsXR9D049crhMJsxEkaOY=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=eiGNldaMygo5OTFaHoEE0qjWMe8FT4R+MYPuZxZ17GP8QZxwEvy4yYOKeVKJoS+Q/Eh4fC9aaWX1htyqEGzF8fsVwlhGOfcwubIzfmX1ZQ8Pb6Nlpu7IoZDo1SEJlx0s4oM4aQkS/ekVWlRGE3LS22tkbdnln24m7FoitBZ3G/k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NBopn1Ty; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NBopn1Ty" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F10E41F000FF; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:31:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790850675; bh=7ppqlQBPRreQgaQbXc0wgcQsXR9D049crhMJsxEkaOY=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=NBopn1Ty1yGX7/ltNPkqJzf24m2c48+jsd8nMphTWts7EDZ+YCdAVVL6UlIl4p51s pWREcm7ovgcOrZaAEOUL7p7CPFJaIUYn2iEe5DPncGvzrd2JXXuzRQY6MV6Xtayv3l 3W20UmoBRD4uh2VOe44T7KGfhqZSsFUJYYbrG3jSTIlU2pZYmaMsD9mmCrD6wXcrli u25JCePYsxuvXMq+YrUf4udvPY/hKCy1iiZoqcSroQ8XgLIME7S8CzaTqs8hbVs0R1 f4vLzuZbHnAoXX5BGjiOsLoaUaFpnrwdWcNkAEihF4f8KvlYkL528u2XMscWx6KwKM EDc9AY9+FqpUg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 13/16] PCI/CXL: Reject reset with unsafe function scope Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Srirangan Madhavan" Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261001092227.3004747-14-smadhavan@nvidia.com> References: <20261001092227.3004747-1-smadhavan@nvidia.com> <20261001092227.3004747-14-smadhavan@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:31:14 +0000 Message-Id: <20261001103114.F10E41F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The per-device PCI reset interface must not reset sibling functions. > Reject cxl_reset and cxl_bus for multifunction devices and PFs with > enabled VFs. >=20 > Suggested-by: Alex Williamson > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260626160846.426e71b6@nvidia.co= m/ > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/6a50441e2bb5e_3cabcb1003e@djbw-de= v.notmuch/ > Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001092227.3004= 747-1-smadhavan@nvidia.com?part=3D13