From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Geramy Loveless <gloveless@jqluv.com>, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
cristi@ieee.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: mark Thunderbolt-attached devices as removable
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 11:00:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26e1e270-c6ae-4389-9956-3b4554db7735@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428223147.3092087-1-gloveless@jqluv.com>
On 4/28/26 17:31, Geramy Loveless wrote:
> pci_set_removable() only marks devices as removable if their upstream
> bridge has the ACPI ExternalFacingPort property set. Some firmware
> (e.g. MSI MS-S1 MAX with AMD Strix Halo) does not set this property on
> Thunderbolt root ports, so devices behind them are never marked
> removable. This causes all drivers that use dev_is_removable() to miss
> eGPU-specific code paths.
Just to be clear on the topology here - this machine actually has both
USB4 and USB4v2 routers.
There are 2 USB4 routers that are part of the APU.
Therea are 2 USB4v2 routers that are from a discrete chip.
Looking at the port I/O connectivity on their website [1], I suppose the
"front" connectivity ones are the USB4 routers and the "rear" ones are
USB4v2? This issue you're hitting where devices are missing
ExternalFacingPort - is it an issue with the rear ones, front ones, or both?
Link: https://www.minisforum.com/products/ms-s1-max [1]
>
> Fall back to pci_is_thunderbolt_attached() when the parent is not
> already marked removable. set_pcie_thunderbolt() runs before
> pci_set_removable() during device add, so the is_thunderbolt flag is
> already available.
>
> This fixes the problem at the PCI core level so all drivers benefit
> from correct removable detection, not just individual drivers that add
> their own Thunderbolt checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geramy Loveless <gloveless@jqluv.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index bccc7a4bdd7..2387edc5b89 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -1761,17 +1761,23 @@ static void pci_set_removable(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (!parent)
> return;
> /*
> - * We (only) consider everything tunneled below an external_facing
> - * device to be removable by the user. We're mainly concerned with
> - * consumer platforms with user accessible thunderbolt ports that are
> - * vulnerable to DMA attacks, and we expect those ports to be marked by
> - * the firmware as external_facing. Devices in traditional hotplug
> - * slots can technically be removed, but the expectation is that unless
> - * the port is marked with external_facing, such devices are less
> + * We consider everything tunneled below an external_facing device to
> + * be removable by the user. We're mainly concerned with consumer
> + * platforms with user accessible thunderbolt ports that are vulnerable
> + * to DMA attacks, and we expect those ports to be marked by the
> + * firmware as external_facing. Devices in traditional hotplug slots
> + * can technically be removed, but the expectation is that unless the
> + * port is marked with external_facing, such devices are less
> * accessible to user / may not be removed by end user, and thus not
> * exposed as "removable" to userspace.
> + *
> + * Some firmware does not set the ExternalFacingPort property on
> + * Thunderbolt root ports. In that case, fall back to checking
> + * whether the device sits below a Thunderbolt controller, which
> + * is itself inherently user-removable.
> */
> - if (dev_is_removable(&parent->dev)) {
> + if (dev_is_removable(&parent->dev) ||
> + pci_is_thunderbolt_attached(dev)) {
> dev_set_removable(&dev->dev, DEVICE_REMOVABLE);
> return;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 22:31 [PATCH] PCI: mark Thunderbolt-attached devices as removable Geramy Loveless
2026-05-05 16:00 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26e1e270-c6ae-4389-9956-3b4554db7735@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=cristi@ieee.org \
--cc=gloveless@jqluv.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox