public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, lukas@wunner.de
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 2/5] iommu/vt-d: break out ATS Invalidation if target device is gone
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:29:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <290c30a5-c828-47e1-be42-a5a11a944a5c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0446efb-936c-4abc-839b-8e6c3f28ee07@linux.intel.com>


On 1/10/2024 1:17 PM, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 12/29/23 1:02 AM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>> For those endpoint devices connect to system via hotplug capable ports,
>> users could request a warm reset to the device by flapping device's link
>> through setting the slot's link control register, as pciehp_ist() DLLSC
>> interrupt sequence response, pciehp will unload the device driver and
>> then power it off. thus cause an IOMMU device-TLB invalidation (Intel
>> VT-d spec, or ATS Invalidation in PCIe spec r6.1) request for device to
>> be sent and a long time completion/timeout waiting in interrupt context.
>>
>> That would cause following continuous hard lockup warning and system 
>> hang
>>
>> [ 4211.433662] pcieport 0000:17:01.0: pciehp: Slot(108): Link Down
>> [ 4211.433664] pcieport 0000:17:01.0: pciehp: Slot(108): Card not 
>> present
>> [ 4223.822591] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 144
>> [ 4223.822622] CPU: 144 PID: 1422 Comm: irq/57-pciehp Kdump: loaded 
>> Tainted: G S
>>           OE    kernel version xxxx
>> [ 4223.822623] Hardware name: vendorname xxxx 666-106,
>> BIOS 01.01.02.03.01 05/15/2023
>> [ 4223.822623] RIP: 0010:qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822624] Code: 48 be 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 49 85 74 24 20 0f 
>> 95 c1 48 8b
>>   57 10 83 c1 04 83 3c 1a 03 0f 84 a2 01 00 00 49 8b 04 24 8b 70 34 
>> <40> f6 c6 1
>> 0 74 17 49 8b 04 24 8b 80 80 00 00 00 89 c2 d3 fa 41 39
>> [ 4223.822624] RSP: 0018:ffffc4f074f0bbb8 EFLAGS: 00000093
>> [ 4223.822625] RAX: ffffc4f040059000 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX: 
>> 0000000000000005
>> [ 4223.822625] RDX: ffff9f3841315800 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 
>> ffff9f38401a8340
>> [ 4223.822625] RBP: ffff9f38401a8340 R08: ffffc4f074f0bc00 R09: 
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822626] R10: 0000000000000010 R11: 0000000000000018 R12: 
>> ffff9f384005e200
>> [ 4223.822626] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000046 R15: 
>> 0000000000000004
>> [ 4223.822626] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa237ae400000(0000)
>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822627] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [ 4223.822627] CR2: 00007ffe86515d80 CR3: 000002fd3000a001 CR4: 
>> 0000000000770ee0
>> [ 4223.822627] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822628] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 
>> 0000000000000400
>> [ 4223.822628] PKRU: 55555554
>> [ 4223.822628] Call Trace:
>> [ 4223.822628]  qi_flush_dev_iotlb+0xb1/0xd0
>> [ 4223.822628]  __dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x224/0x250
>> [ 4223.822629]  dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x3e/0x50
>> [ 4223.822629]  intel_iommu_release_device+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822629]  iommu_release_device+0x33/0x60
>> [ 4223.822629]  iommu_bus_notifier+0x7f/0x90
>> [ 4223.822630]  blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0x90
>> [ 4223.822630]  device_del+0x2e5/0x420
>> [ 4223.822630]  pci_remove_bus_device+0x70/0x110
>> [ 4223.822630]  pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x7c/0x130
>> [ 4223.822631]  pciehp_disable_slot+0x6b/0x100
>> [ 4223.822631]  pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xd8/0x320
>> [ 4223.822631]  pciehp_ist+0x176/0x180
>> [ 4223.822631]  ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.50+0x110/0x110
>> [ 4223.822632]  irq_thread_fn+0x19/0x50
>> [ 4223.822632]  irq_thread+0x104/0x190
>> [ 4223.822632]  ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4223.822632]  ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xe0/0xe0
>> [ 4223.822633]  kthread+0x114/0x130
>> [ 4223.822633]  ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
>> [ 4223.822633]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822633] Kernel panic - not syncing: Hard LOCKUP
>> [ 4223.822634] CPU: 144 PID: 1422 Comm: irq/57-pciehp Kdump: loaded 
>> Tainted: G S
>>           OE     kernel version xxxx
>> [ 4223.822634] Hardware name: vendorname xxxx 666-106,
>> BIOS 01.01.02.03.01 05/15/2023
>> [ 4223.822634] Call Trace:
>> [ 4223.822634]  <NMI>
>> [ 4223.822635]  dump_stack+0x6d/0x88
>> [ 4223.822635]  panic+0x101/0x2d0
>> [ 4223.822635]  ? ret_from_fork+0x11/0x30
>> [ 4223.822635]  nmi_panic.cold.14+0xc/0xc
>> [ 4223.822636]  watchdog_overflow_callback.cold.8+0x6d/0x81
>> [ 4223.822636]  __perf_event_overflow+0x4f/0xf0
>> [ 4223.822636]  handle_pmi_common+0x1ef/0x290
>> [ 4223.822636]  ? __set_pte_vaddr+0x28/0x40
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? flush_tlb_one_kernel+0xa/0x20
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? __native_set_fixmap+0x24/0x30
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? ghes_copy_tofrom_phys+0x70/0x100
>> [ 4223.822637]  ? __ghes_peek_estatus.isra.16+0x49/0xa0
>> [ 4223.822637]  intel_pmu_handle_irq+0xba/0x2b0
>> [ 4223.822638]  perf_event_nmi_handler+0x24/0x40
>> [ 4223.822638]  nmi_handle+0x4d/0xf0
>> [ 4223.822638]  default_do_nmi+0x49/0x100
>> [ 4223.822638]  exc_nmi+0x134/0x180
>> [ 4223.822639]  end_repeat_nmi+0x16/0x67
>> [ 4223.822639] RIP: 0010:qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822639] Code: 48 be 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 49 85 74 24 20 0f 
>> 95 c1 48 8b
>>   57 10 83 c1 04 83 3c 1a 03 0f 84 a2 01 00 00 49 8b 04 24 8b 70 34 
>> <40> f6 c6 10
>>   74 17 49 8b 04 24 8b 80 80 00 00 00 89 c2 d3 fa 41 39
>> [ 4223.822640] RSP: 0018:ffffc4f074f0bbb8 EFLAGS: 00000093
>> [ 4223.822640] RAX: ffffc4f040059000 RBX: 0000000000000014 RCX: 
>> 0000000000000005
>> [ 4223.822640] RDX: ffff9f3841315800 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 
>> ffff9f38401a8340
>> [ 4223.822641] RBP: ffff9f38401a8340 R08: ffffc4f074f0bc00 R09: 
>> 0000000000000000
>> [ 4223.822641] R10: 0000000000000010 R11: 0000000000000018 R12: 
>> ffff9f384005e200
>> [ 4223.822641] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000046 R15: 
>> 0000000000000004
>> [ 4223.822641]  ? qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822642]  ? qi_submit_sync+0x2c0/0x490
>> [ 4223.822642]  </NMI>
>> [ 4223.822642]  qi_flush_dev_iotlb+0xb1/0xd0
>> [ 4223.822642]  __dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x224/0x250
>> [ 4223.822643]  dmar_remove_one_dev_info+0x3e/0x50
>> [ 4223.822643]  intel_iommu_release_device+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822643]  iommu_release_device+0x33/0x60
>> [ 4223.822643]  iommu_bus_notifier+0x7f/0x90
>> [ 4223.822644]  blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0x90
>> [ 4223.822644]  device_del+0x2e5/0x420
>> [ 4223.822644]  pci_remove_bus_device+0x70/0x110
>> [ 4223.822644]  pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x7c/0x130
>> [ 4223.822644]  pciehp_disable_slot+0x6b/0x100
>> [ 4223.822645]  pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xd8/0x320
>> [ 4223.822645]  pciehp_ist+0x176/0x180
>> [ 4223.822645]  ? irq_finalize_oneshot.part.50+0x110/0x110
>> [ 4223.822645]  irq_thread_fn+0x19/0x50
>> [ 4223.822646]  irq_thread+0x104/0x190
>> [ 4223.822646]  ? irq_forced_thread_fn+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4223.822646]  ? irq_thread_check_affinity+0xe0/0xe0
>> [ 4223.822646]  kthread+0x114/0x130
>> [ 4223.822647]  ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
>> [ 4223.822647]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>> [ 4223.822647] Kernel Offset: 0x6400000 from 0xffffffff81000000 
>> (relocation
>> range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
>>
>> Furthermore even an in-process safe removal unplugged device could be
>> surprise removed anytime, thus need to check the ATS Invalidation target
>> device state to see if it is gone, and don't wait for the completion/
>> timeout blindly, thus avoid the up to 1min+50% (see Implementation Note
>> in PCIe spec r6.1 sec 10.3.1) waiting and cause hard lockup or system
>> hang.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> index 3d661f2b7946..0a8d628a42ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
>> @@ -1423,6 +1423,14 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu, 
>> struct qi_desc *desc,
>>       writel(qi->free_head << shift, iommu->reg + DMAR_IQT_REG);
>>         while (qi->desc_status[wait_index] != QI_DONE) {
>> +        /*
>> +         * if the device-TLB invalidation target device is gone, don't
>> +         * wait anymore, it might take up to 1min+50%, causes system
>> +         * hang. (see Implementation Note in PCIe spec r6.1 sec 10.3.1)
>> +         */
>> +        if ((type == QI_DIOTLB_TYPE || type == QI_DEIOTLB_TYPE) && 
>> pdev)
>> +            if (!pci_device_is_present(pdev))
>> +                    break;
>>           /*
>>            * We will leave the interrupts disabled, to prevent interrupt
>>            * context to queue another cmd while a cmd is already 
>> submitted
>
> How about handing this in qi_check_fault() when it detects an ITE error?

fold into qi_check_fault() looks reasonable, no response from endpoint

device is a kind of fault. my concern there is no real ITE there (it didn't

wait for enough time), but it predicts there would be a timeout, that

is weird if we describe the fact, -ENOTCONN would be more precise

(device is not conneted)  well -ETIMEDOUT could simplify the caller error

handling, the side effect is we have to add pdev parameter to 
qi_check_fault()

too. then no need to check invalidition type of QI_IOTLB_TYPE &

QI_EIOTLB_TYPE in qi_check_fault() ? , seems we could save another

patch then, I am still not be convinced :), on the wall, not incline

to which side.

pros

- qi_submit_sync() could be simpler in error handling.

- qi_check_fault() does the right thing it should do.

- save another patch to break the loop.

cons

- more parameters to qi_check_fault()

- lost one opportunity to break loop while retry, but will bail out in 
next try.



Thanks,

Ethan

>
> qi_check_fault() should returns -ETIMEDOUT instead of -EAGAIN, if
>
> - qi_submit_sync() is called for a device TLB invalidation request
>   (indicated by pdev is valid);
> - device is not present.
>
> Best regards,
> baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-10  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-28 17:02 [RFC PATCH v10 0/5] fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device Ethan Zhao
2023-12-28 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v10 1/5] iommu/vt-d: add pci_dev parameter to qi_submit_sync and refactor callers Ethan Zhao
2024-01-10  4:59   ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-10  7:51     ` Ethan Zhao
2023-12-28 17:02 ` [RFC PATCH v10 2/5] iommu/vt-d: break out ATS Invalidation if target device is gone Ethan Zhao
2024-01-10  5:17   ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-10  8:29     ` Ethan Zhao [this message]
2023-12-29  8:18 ` [RFC PATCH v10 0/5] fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device Tian, Kevin
2023-12-29  9:28   ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-09  1:24 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-15  7:58 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-17  3:24   ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-17  5:26     ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-17  5:38       ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-17  9:00         ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-18  0:46           ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-18  2:26             ` Ethan Zhao
2024-01-18  2:32               ` Ethan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=290c30a5-c828-47e1-be42-a5a11a944a5c@linux.intel.com \
    --to=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox