linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jcm@redhat.com,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/pci: Virtualize Maximum Payload Size
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:29:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c094ad6-4641-ebee-7faa-21ad9beeca72@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170920101133.33b68d8f@w520.home>

On 9/20/2017 12:11 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> My impression is that the issue would be inefficiency.  There should be
> nothing functionally wrong with a read request less than MPS, but we're
> not "filling" the TLP as much as the topology allows.  Is that your
> understanding as well, Sinan?

That's my understanding as well. It would be a performance hit to use a
value less than MPS.


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-20 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170919164952.13200.78849.stgit@gimli.home>
     [not found] ` <c3bbb645-50a9-a1b4-c8f2-8973f0478a2a@redhat.com>
2017-09-19 20:20   ` [PATCH] vfio/pci: Virtualize Maximum Payload Size Alex Williamson
2017-09-20  7:59     ` Auger Eric
2017-09-20 13:01       ` Sinan Kaya
2017-09-20 13:02         ` Sinan Kaya
2017-09-20 14:26         ` Auger Eric
2017-09-20 15:04           ` Sinan Kaya
2017-09-20 16:11           ` Alex Williamson
2017-09-20 16:29             ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-09-21  6:36               ` Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c094ad6-4641-ebee-7faa-21ad9beeca72@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).