linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, andrew.murray@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rockchip: Make some regulators non-optional
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 19:57:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ed040d3-bcea-c15c-dbda-fb589d6e2c27@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e8a91353-49ab-7581-f2a8-b8b4729072bf@suse.com>



On 2020/11/7 下午7:36, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019/11/21 上午1:05, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 12:54:19PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> The 0V9 and 1V8 supplies power the PCIe block in the SoC itself, and
>>> are thus fundamental to PCIe being usable at all. As such, it makes
>>> sense to treat them as non-optional and rely on dummy regulators if
>>> not explicitly described.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 69 ++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> Applied to pci/rockchip, thanks.
> 
> Sorry, this commit is cause regression for RK3399 boards unable to
> detect the controller anymore.
> 
> The 1v8 (and 0v9) is causing -517 and reject the controller initialization.
> 
> I'm not a PCI guy, but a quick google search shows these two voltages
> are not related to PCIE core functionality, especially considering the
> controller used in RK3399 are mostly to provide NVME support.
> 
> This bug makes all RK3399 users who put root fs into NVME driver unable
> to boot the device.
> 
> I really hope some one could test the patch before affecting the end
> users or at least try to understand how most users would use the PCIE
> interface for.

My bad, it's not that easy. The dtsi has vpcie1v8 and vpcie0v9 defined.
It should be something else wrong.

Thanks,
Qu
> 
> Thanks,
> Qu
> 
>>
>> Lorenzo
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
>>> index ef8e677ce9d1..68525f8ac4d9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
>>> @@ -620,19 +620,13 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_parse_host_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>>>  		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie3v3 regulator found\n");
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	rockchip->vpcie1v8 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie1v8");
>>> -	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8)) {
>>> -		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8) != -ENODEV)
>>> -			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> -		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie1v8 regulator found\n");
>>> -	}
>>> +	rockchip->vpcie1v8 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vpcie1v8");
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>>> +		return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>>  
>>> -	rockchip->vpcie0v9 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie0v9");
>>> -	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
>>> -		if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9) != -ENODEV)
>>> -			return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> -		dev_info(dev, "no vpcie0v9 regulator found\n");
>>> -	}
>>> +	rockchip->vpcie0v9 = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vpcie0v9");
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>>> +		return PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -658,27 +652,22 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_set_vpcie(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>>>  		}
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8)) {
>>> -		err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> -		if (err) {
>>> -			dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie1v8 regulator\n");
>>> -			goto err_disable_3v3;
>>> -		}
>>> +	err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> +	if (err) {
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie1v8 regulator\n");
>>> +		goto err_disable_3v3;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
>>> -		err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> -		if (err) {
>>> -			dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>>> -			goto err_disable_1v8;
>>> -		}
>>> +	err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> +	if (err) {
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>>> +		goto err_disable_1v8;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  
>>>  err_disable_1v8:
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>>> -		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> +	regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>>  err_disable_3v3:
>>>  	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>>>  		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>>> @@ -897,8 +886,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>>  
>>>  	rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(rockchip);
>>>  
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>>> -		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> +	regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>>  
>>>  	return ret;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -908,12 +896,10 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>>  	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>  	int err;
>>>  
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9)) {
>>> -		err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> -		if (err) {
>>> -			dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>>> -			return err;
>>> -		}
>>> +	err = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> +	if (err) {
>>> +		dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie0v9 regulator\n");
>>> +		return err;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  	err = rockchip_pcie_enable_clocks(rockchip);
>>> @@ -939,8 +925,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused rockchip_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
>>>  err_pcie_resume:
>>>  	rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(rockchip);
>>>  err_disable_0v9:
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>>> -		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> +	regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>>  	return err;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> @@ -1081,10 +1066,8 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie12v);
>>>  	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>>>  		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>>> -		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>>> -		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> +	regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> +	regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>>  err_set_vpcie:
>>>  	rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(rockchip);
>>>  	return err;
>>> @@ -1108,10 +1091,8 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie12v);
>>>  	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>>>  		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie1v8))
>>> -		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> -	if (!IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie0v9))
>>> -		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>> +	regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie1v8);
>>> +	regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie0v9);
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>> -- 
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-07 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-16 12:54 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rockchip: Make some regulators non-optional Robin Murphy
2019-11-16 12:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip: Simplify optional regulator handling Robin Murphy
2019-11-18 11:59   ` Mark Brown
2019-11-18 12:20     ` Robin Murphy
2019-11-18 12:39       ` Andrew Murray
2019-11-18 13:10         ` Robin Murphy
2019-11-18 13:17           ` Andrew Murray
2019-11-18 14:24     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-18 18:15       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-11-18 18:38         ` Mark Brown
2019-11-18 11:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rockchip: Make some regulators non-optional Mark Brown
2019-11-18 12:28 ` Andrew Murray
2019-11-20 17:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-11-07 11:36   ` Qu Wenruo
2020-11-07 11:57     ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-11-07 12:47     ` Robin Murphy
2020-11-07 12:54       ` Qu Wenruo
2020-11-07 13:30         ` Qu Wenruo
2020-11-09 12:00           ` Robin Murphy
2020-11-09 12:38             ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ed040d3-bcea-c15c-dbda-fb589d6e2c27@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).