From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: enable extended tags support for PCIe endpoints To: Bjorn Helgaas References: <1474769434-5756-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <420a9a23-79f8-41d8-c44f-b53f5000c957@codeaurora.org> <20161111205801.GC9868@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, vikrams@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <34f2e149-3bb1-6af2-a9f5-fbe5a050fe31@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:49:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161111205801.GC9868@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-ID: Hi Bjorn, On 11/11/2016 3:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> Is there any other feedback? > If this were completely safe to enable for every device that supported > it, why would there be an enable bit in Device Control? > > I don't know anything about extended tags, but it worries me a little > when there's a "go-fast" switch and no explanation about when and why > we might need to go slow. > I have v2 posted. Do you feel like applying to linux-next to get some testing exposure or do you want to tie it to some DMI so that we enable it only on recent HW? Sinan -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.