public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>,
	Frank.Li@nxp.com, kishon@kernel.org, jdmason@kudzu.us,
	mani@kernel.org, allenbh@gmail.com, kwilczynski@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ntb@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] NTB: epf: Document legacy doorbell slot offset in ntb_epf_peer_db_set()
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:46:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38d9206d-08a3-4b69-a97f-902160bd9e31@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260224133459.1741537-7-den@valinux.co.jp>



On 2/24/26 6:34 AM, Koichiro Den wrote:
> ntb_epf_peer_db_set() uses ffs(db_bits) to select a doorbell to ring.
> ffs() returns a 1-based bit index (bit 0 -> 1).
> 
> Entry 0 is reserved for link events, so doorbell bit 0 must map to entry
> 1. However, since the initial commit 812ce2f8d14e ("NTB: Add support for
> EPF PCI Non-Transparent Bridge"), the implementation has been adding an
> extra +1, ending up using entry 2 for bit 0. Fixing the extra increment
> would break interoperability with peers running older kernels.
> 
> Keep the legacy behavior and document the offset and the resulting slot
> layout to avoid confusion when enabling per-db-vector handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>

Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/ntb/hw/epf/ntb_hw_epf.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/hw/epf/ntb_hw_epf.c b/drivers/ntb/hw/epf/ntb_hw_epf.c
> index d3ecf25a5162..bce7130fec39 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/hw/epf/ntb_hw_epf.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/hw/epf/ntb_hw_epf.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@
>  #define NTB_EPF_DB_DATA(n)	(0x34 + (n) * 4)
>  #define NTB_EPF_DB_OFFSET(n)	(0xB4 + (n) * 4)
>  
> +/*
> + * Legacy doorbell slot layout when paired with pci-epf-*ntb:
> + *
> + *   slot 0 : reserved for link events
> + *   slot 1 : unused (historical extra offset)
> + *   slot 2 : DB#0
> + *   slot 3 : DB#1
> + *   ...
> + *
> + * Thus, NTB_EPF_MIN_DB_COUNT=3 means that we at least create vectors for
> + * doorbells DB#0 and DB#1.
> + */
>  #define NTB_EPF_MIN_DB_COUNT	3
>  #define NTB_EPF_MAX_DB_COUNT	31
>  
> @@ -473,6 +485,14 @@ static int ntb_epf_peer_mw_get_addr(struct ntb_dev *ntb, int idx,
>  static int ntb_epf_peer_db_set(struct ntb_dev *ntb, u64 db_bits)
>  {
>  	struct ntb_epf_dev *ndev = ntb_ndev(ntb);
> +	/*
> +	 * ffs() returns a 1-based bit index (bit 0 -> 1).
> +	 *
> +	 * With slot 0 reserved for link events, DB#0 would naturally map to
> +	 * slot 1. Historically an extra +1 offset was added, so DB#0 maps to
> +	 * slot 2 and slot 1 remains unused. Keep this mapping for
> +	 * backward-compatibility.
> +	 */
>  	u32 interrupt_num = ffs(db_bits) + 1;
>  	struct device *dev = ndev->dev;
>  	u32 db_entry_size;


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-25 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24 13:34 [PATCH 00/10] NTB: epf: Enable per-doorbell bit handling while keeping legacy offset Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 01/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Document legacy MSI doorbell offset Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:34   ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 02/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Defer pci_epc_raise_irq() out of atomic context Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:36   ` Frank Li
2026-02-26  1:02     ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-27  7:32   ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 03/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Report 0-based doorbell vector via ntb_db_event() Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:54   ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Exclude reserved slots from db_valid_mask Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 20:55   ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: Implement db_vector_count/mask for doorbells Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 21:02   ` Frank Li
2026-02-27  6:23     ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 06/10] NTB: epf: Document legacy doorbell slot offset in ntb_epf_peer_db_set() Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 16:46   ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-02-25 21:03   ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 07/10] NTB: epf: Make db_valid_mask cover only real doorbell bits Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 16:47   ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-26  3:24     ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 21:07   ` Frank Li
2026-02-26  1:25     ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 08/10] NTB: epf: Report 0-based doorbell vector via ntb_db_event() Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 16:59   ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-26  3:17     ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 21:09   ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 09/10] NTB: epf: Fix doorbell bitmask handling in db_read/db_clear Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 17:04   ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-25 21:11   ` Frank Li
2026-02-24 13:34 ` [PATCH 10/10] NTB: epf: Implement db_vector_count/mask for doorbells Koichiro Den
2026-02-25 17:09   ` Dave Jiang
2026-02-25 21:13   ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38d9206d-08a3-4b69-a97f-902160bd9e31@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox