Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Poll more often in rcar_pcie_wait_for_dl()

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

On 05/22/2018 11:42 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,

Hi,

> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The data link active signal usually takes ~20 uSec to be asserted,
>> poll the bit more often to avoid useless delays in this function.
>> Use udelay() instead of usleep() for such a small delay as suggested
>> by the timer documentation and because this will be used in atomic
>> context later on when the suspend/resume patches land.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
>> @@ -529,13 +529,13 @@ static void phy_write_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
>>
>>  static int rcar_pcie_wait_for_dl(struct rcar_pcie *pcie)
>>  {
>> -       unsigned int timeout = 10;
>> +       unsigned int timeout = 10000;
>>
>>         while (timeout--) {
>>                 if ((rcar_pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIETSTR) & DATA_LINK_ACTIVE))
>>                         return 0;
>>
>> -               msleep(5);
>> +               udelay(5);
> 
> + cpu_relax()?

Is it safe to use in atomic context ? Because of that suspend/resume thing.

>>         }
> 
> if this ever happens, it will have blocked for more than 50 ms...

Well yes, so did the previous thing.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut