From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"William McVicker" <willmcvicker@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/25] PCI: Perform reset_resource() and build fail list in sync
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:22:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a47fc82-dc21-46c3-873d-68e713304af3@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f281667-b4ef-9385-868f-93893b9d6611@linux.intel.com>
On 5/6/25 4:53 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2025, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 12/16/24 5:56 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>>> Resetting resource is problematic as it prevent attempting to allocate
>>> the resource later, unless something in between restores the resource.
>>> Similarly, if fail_head does not contain all resources that were reset,
>>> those resource cannot be restored later.
>>>
>>> The entire reset/restore cycle adds complexity and leaving resources
>>> into reseted state causes issues to other code such as for checks done
>>> in pci_enable_resources(). Take a small step towards not resetting
>>> resources by delaying reset until the end of resource assignment and
>>> build failure list (fail_head) in sync with the reset to avoid leaving
>>> behind resources that cannot be restored (for the case where the caller
>>> provides fail_head in the first place to allow restore somewhere in the
>>> callchain, as is not all callers pass non-NULL fail_head).
>>>
>>> The Expansion ROM check is temporarily left in place while building the
>>> failure list until the upcoming change which reworks optional resource
>>> handling.
>>>
>>> Ideally, whole resource reset could be removed but doing that in a big
>>> step would make the impact non-tractable due to complexity of all
>>> related code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> I'm hitting the BUG_ON(!list_empty(&add_list)); in
>> pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources() [1] with 6.15-rc5 and the the
>> pixel6 downstream pcie driver.
>>
>> I saw the thread where "a34d74877c66 PCI: Restore assigned resources
>> fully after release" fixes things for some other cases, but it's not the
>> case here.
>>
>> Reverting the following patches fixes the problem:
>> a34d74877c66 PCI: Restore assigned resources fully after release
>> 2499f5348431 PCI: Rework optional resource handling
>> 96336ec70264 PCI: Perform reset_resource() and build fail list in sync
>
> So it's confirmed that you needed to revert also this last commit
> 96336ec70264, not just the rework change?
I needed to revert 96336ec70264 as well otherwise the build fails.
>
>> In the working case the add_list list is empty throughout the entire
>> body of pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources().
>>
>> In the failing case __pci_bus_size_bridges() leaves the add_list not
>> empty and __pci_bus_assign_resources() does not consume the list, thus
>> the BUG_ON. The failing case contains an extra print that's not shown
>> when reverting the blamed commits:
>> [ 13.951185][ T1101] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
>> 0x00100000-0x001fffff] to [bus 01-ff] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>>
>> I've added some prints trying to describe the code path, see
>> https://paste.ofcode.org/Aeu2YBpLztc49ZDw3uUJmd#
>>
>> Failing case:
>> [ 13.944231][ T1101] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a5a5] type 00 class
>> 0x000000 PCIe Endpoint
>> [ 13.944412][ T1101] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem
>> 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit]
>> [ 13.944532][ T1101] pci 0000:01:00.0: ROM [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff
>> pref]
>> [ 13.944649][ T1101] pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
>> [ 13.944844][ T1101] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
>> [ 13.945015][ T1101] pci 0000:01:00.0: 15.752 Gb/s available PCIe
>> bandwidth, limited by 8.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of
>> 31.506 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link)
>> [ 13.950616][ T1101] __pci_bus_size_bridges: before pbus_size_mem.
>> list empty? 1
>> [ 13.950784][ T1101] pbus_size_mem: 2. list empty? 1
>> [ 13.950886][ T1101] pbus_size_mem: 1 list empty? 0
>> [ 13.950982][ T1101] pbus_size_mem: 3. list empty? 0
>> [ 13.951082][ T1101] pbus_size_mem: 4. list empty? 0
>> [ 13.951185][ T1101] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
>> 0x00100000-0x001fffff] to [bus 01-ff] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
>> [ 13.951448][ T1101] __pci_bus_size_bridges: after pbus_size_mem. list
>> empty? 0
>> [ 13.951643][ T1101] pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources: before
>> __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 0
>> [ 13.951924][ T1101] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
>> 0x40000000-0x401fffff]: assigned
>> [ 13.952248][ T1101] pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources: after
>> __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 0
>> [ 13.952634][ T1101] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 13.952818][ T1101] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/setup-bus.c:2514!
>> [ 13.953045][ T1101] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1]
>> SMP
>> ...
>> [ 13.976086][ T1101] Call trace:
>> [ 13.976206][ T1101] pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources+0x110/0x114 (P)
>> [ 13.976462][ T1101] pci_rescan_bus+0x28/0x48
>> [ 13.976628][ T1101] exynos_pcie_rc_poweron
>>
>> Working case:
>> [ 13.786961][ T1120] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a5a5] type 00 class
>> 0x000000 PCIe Endpoint
>> [ 13.787136][ T1120] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem
>> 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit]
>> [ 13.787280][ T1120] pci 0000:01:00.0: ROM [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff
>> pref]
>> [ 13.787541][ T1120] pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
>> [ 13.787808][ T1120] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
>> [ 13.787988][ T1120] pci 0000:01:00.0: 15.752 Gb/s available PCIe
>> bandwidth, limited by 8.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of
>> 31.506 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link)
>> [ 13.795279][ T1120] __pci_bus_size_bridges: before pbus_size_mem.
>> list empty? 1
>> [ 13.795408][ T1120] pbus_size_mem: 2. list empty? 1
>> [ 13.795495][ T1120] pbus_size_mem: 2. list empty? 1
>> [ 13.795577][ T1120] __pci_bus_size_bridges: after pbus_size_mem. list
>> empty? 1
>> [ 13.795692][ T1120] pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources: before
>> __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 1
>> [ 13.795849][ T1120] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
>> 0x40000000-0x401fffff]: assigned
>> [ 13.796072][ T1120] pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources: after
>> __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 1
>> [ 13.796662][ T1120] cpif: s5100_poweron_pcie: DBG: MSI sfr not set
>> up, yet(s5100_pdev is NULL)
>> [ 13.796666][ T1120] cpif: register_pcie: s51xx_pcie_init start
>>
>>
>> Any hints are welcomed. Thanks,
>> ta
>
> Hi and thanks for the report.
Hi! Thanks for the help. I've been out of office for the last 2 weeks,
sorry for the delayed reply.
>
> The interesting part occurs inside reassign_resources_sorted() where most
> items are eliminated from realloc_head by the list_del().
>
> My guess is that somehow, the change in 96336ec70264 from !res->flags
> to the more complicated check somehow causes this. If the new check
> doesn't match and subsequently, no match is found from the head list, the
> loop will do continue and not remove the entry from realloc_head.
I added a print right there and it seems it's something else. See below.
>
> But it's hard to confirm without knowing what that resources realloc_head
> contains. Perhaps if you print the resources that are processed around
> that part of the code in reassign_resources_sorted(), comparing the log
> from the reverted code with the non-working case might help to understand
> what is different there and why. To understand better what is in the head
> list, it would be also useful to know from which device the resources were
> added into the head list in pdev_sort_resources().
>
I added the suggested prints
(https://paste.ofcode.org/DgmZGGgS6D36nWEzmfCqMm) on top of v6.15 with
the downstream PCIe pixel driver and I obtain the following. Note that
all added prints contain "tudor" for differentiation.
[ 15.211179][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: [144d:a5a5] type 00 class
0x000000 PCIe Endpoint
[ 15.212248][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem
0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit]
[ 15.212775][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: ROM [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff
pref]
[ 15.213195][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
[ 15.213720][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
D3cold
[ 15.214035][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: 15.752 Gb/s available PCIe
bandwidth, limited by 8.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link at 0001:00:00.0 (capable of
31.506 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link)
[ 15.222286][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: tudor: 1: pbus_size_mem: BAR 0
[mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit] list empty? 1
[ 15.222813][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: tudor: 1: pbus_size_mem: ROM
[mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref] list empty? 1
[ 15.224429][ T1107] pci 0001:01:00.0: tudor: 2: pbus_size_mem: ROM
[mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref] list empty? 0
[ 15.224750][ T1107] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
0x00100000-0x001fffff] to [bus 01-ff] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
[ 15.225393][ T1107] tudor : pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources:
before __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 0
[ 15.225594][ T1107] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: tudor:
pdev_sort_resources: bridge window [mem 0x00100000-0x001fffff] resource
added in head list
[ 15.226078][ T1107] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
0x40000000-0x401fffff]: assigned
[ 15.226419][ T1107] tudor : pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources:
after __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 0
[ 15.226442][ T1107] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 15.227587][ T1107] kernel BUG at drivers/pci/setup-bus.c:2522!
[ 15.227813][ T1107] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1]
SMP
...
[ 15.251570][ T1107] Call trace:
[ 15.251690][ T1107] pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources+0x110/0x114 (P)
[ 15.251945][ T1107] pci_rescan_bus+0x28/0x48
I obtain the following output when using the same prints adapted
(https://paste.ofcode.org/37w7RnKkPaCxyNhi5yhZPbZ) and with the blamed
commits reverted:
a34d74877c66 PCI: Restore assigned resources fully after release
2499f5348431 PCI: Rework optional resource handling
96336ec70264 PCI: Perform reset_resource() and build fail list in sync
[ 15.200456][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: [144d:a5a5] type 00 class
0x000000 PCIe Endpoint
[ 15.200632][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem
0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit]
[ 15.200755][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: ROM [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff
pref]
[ 15.200876][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
[ 15.201075][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
[ 15.201254][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: 15.752 Gb/s available PCIe
bandwidth, limited by 8.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of
31.506 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link)
[ 15.206555][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: tudor: 1: pbus_size_mem: BAR 0
[mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit] list empty? 1
[ 15.206737][ T1102] pci 0000:01:00.0: tudor: 1: pbus_size_mem: ROM
[mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref] list empty? 1
[ 15.206901][ T1102] tudor : pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources:
before __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 1
[ 15.207072][ T1102] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: tudor:
pdev_sort_resources: bridge window [mem 0x00100000-0x002fffff] resource
added in head list
[ 15.207396][ T1102] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem
0x40000000-0x401fffff]: assigned
[ 15.208165][ T1102] tudor : pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources:
after __pci_bus_assign_resources -> list empty? 1
[ 15.208783][ T1102] cpif: s5100_poweron_pcie: DBG: MSI sfr not set
up, yet(s5100_pdev is NULL)
[ 15.208786][ T1102] cpif: register_pcie: s51xx_pcie_init start
> In any case, that BUG_ON() seems a bit drastic action for what might be
> just a single resource allocation failure so it should be downgraded to:
>
> if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&add_list))
> free_list(&add_list);
>
> ... or WARN_ON_ONCE().
I saw your patch doing this, the phone now boots, but obviously I still
see the WARN, so maybe there's still something to be fixed.
Thanks!
ta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 17:56 [PATCH 00/25] PCI: Resource fitting/assignment fixes and cleanups Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 01/25] PCI: Remove add_align overwrite unrelated to size0 Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 02/25] PCI: size0 is unrelated to add_align Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 03/25] PCI: Simplify size1 assignment logic Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 04/25] PCI: Optional bridge window size too may need relaxing Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 05/25] PCI: Fix old_size lower bound in calculate_iosize() too Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 06/25] PCI: Use SZ_* instead of literals in setup-bus.c Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 07/25] PCI: resource_set_range/size() conversions Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 08/25] PCI: Add a helper to identify IOV resources Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 09/25] PCI: Check resource_size() separately Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 10/25] PCI: Add pci_resource_num() helper Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/25] PCI: Add dev & res local variables to resource assignment funcs Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 12/25] PCI: Converge return paths in __assign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 13/25] PCI: Refactor pdev_sort_resources() & __dev_sort_resources() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 14/25] PCI: Use while loop and break instead of gotos Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 15/25] PCI: Rename retval to ret Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 16/25] PCI: Consolidate assignment loop next round preparation Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 17/25] PCI: Remove wrong comment from pci_reassign_resource() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 18/25] PCI: Add restore_dev_resource() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 19/25] PCI: Extend enable to check for any optional resource Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 20/25] PCI: Always have realloc_head in __assign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 21/25] PCI: Indicate optional resource assignment failures Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 22/25] PCI: Add debug print when releasing resources before retry Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 23/25] PCI: Use res->parent to check is resource is assigned Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 24/25] PCI: Perform reset_resource() and build fail list in sync Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01 2:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-04-01 10:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01 12:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01 14:15 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-04-01 17:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-11 19:37 ` Ondřej Jirman
2025-04-14 9:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-14 12:19 ` Ondřej Jirman
2025-04-14 13:15 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-14 13:43 ` Ondřej Jirman
2025-04-14 13:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01 13:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-05-06 15:03 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-05-06 15:53 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-28 11:22 ` Tudor Ambarus [this message]
2025-05-28 11:39 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-05-28 13:09 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-05-30 6:55 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-30 6:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-30 14:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-02 14:40 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-02 15:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-02 18:42 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 8:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 10:36 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 10:48 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 11:43 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 14:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 14:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 14:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 15:25 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 17:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 17:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-02 12:32 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-19 0:30 ` D Scott Phillips
2025-06-24 12:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-25 17:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-25 20:33 ` D Scott Phillips
2025-06-26 9:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-26 14:53 ` D Scott Phillips
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 25/25] PCI: Rework optional resource handling Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-13 21:46 ` [PATCH 00/25] PCI: Resource fitting/assignment fixes and cleanups Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14 8:18 ` Xiaochun XC17 Li | 李小春 Xavier
2025-02-14 11:53 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-14 21:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14 9:59 ` Xiaochun Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a47fc82-dc21-46c3-873d-68e713304af3@linaro.org \
--to=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).