linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	 Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	 Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] PCI/DPC: Ignore Surprise Down error on hot removal
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:01:49 +0200 (EET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c5da397-6d72-26cd-7204-4388ff3da1dd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207181854.121335-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3924 bytes --]

On Wed, 7 Feb 2024, Smita Koralahalli wrote:

> According to PCIe r6.0 sec 6.7.6 [1], async removal with DPC may result in
> surprise down error. This error is expected and is just a side-effect of
> async remove.
> 
> Ignore surprise down error generated as a side-effect of async remove.
> Typically, this error is benign as the pciehp handler invoked by PDC
> or/and DLLSC alongside DPC, de-enumerates and brings down the device
> appropriately. But the error messages might confuse users. Get rid of
> these irritating log messages with a 1s delay while pciehp waits for
> dpc recovery.
> 
> The implementation is as follows: On an async remove a DPC is triggered
> along with a Presence Detect State change and/or DLL State Change.
> Determine it's an async remove by checking for DPC Trigger Status in DPC
> Status Register and Surprise Down Error Status in AER Uncorrected Error
> Status to be non-zero. If true, treat the DPC event as a side-effect of
> async remove, clear the error status registers and continue with hot-plug
> tear down routines. If not, follow the existing routine to handle AER and
> DPC errors.
> 
> Please note that, masking Surprise Down Errors was explored as an
> alternative approach, but left due to the odd behavior that masking only
> avoids the interrupt, but still records an error per PCIe r6.0.1 Section
> 6.2.3.2.2. That stale error is going to be reported the next time some
> error other than Surprise Down is handled.
> 
> Dmesg before:
> 
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: containment event, status:0x1f01 source:0x0000
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: unmasked uncorrectable error detected
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID)
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4:   device [1022:14ab] error status/mask=00000020/04004000
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4:    [ 5] SDES (First)
>   nvme nvme2: frozen state error detected, reset controller
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: subordinate device reset failed
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: device recovery failed
>   pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down
>   nvme2n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0
>   pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 49
> 
> Dmesg after:
> 
>  pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down
>  nvme1n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0
>  pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 37
> 
> [1] PCI Express Base Specification Revision 6.0, Dec 16 2021.
>     https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/16609
> 
> Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

> +static void pci_clear_surpdn_errors(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions)
> +		pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap +
> +				       PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS, ~0);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In practice, Surprise Down errors have been observed to also set
> +	 * error bits in the Status Register as well as the Fatal Error
> +	 * Detected bit in the Device Status Register.
> +	 */
> +	pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_STATUS, 0xffff);

Nit: one of these is using ~0 and the other 0xffff which is a bit 
inconsistent.

> +static bool dpc_is_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	u16 status;
> +
> +	if (!pdev->is_hotplug_bridge)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS,
> +				 &status))
> +		return false;

Since you need a line split, I'd have used:
	ret = pci_read_config_word(...
				   ...);
	if (ret != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
		return false;

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>


-- 
 i.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-07 18:18 [PATCH v9] PCI/DPC: Ignore Surprise Down error on hot removal Smita Koralahalli
2024-02-08 12:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2024-02-28 16:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c5da397-6d72-26cd-7204-4388ff3da1dd@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).