From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>
To: dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yilun.xu@linux.intel.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] PCI/IDE: Add IDE establishment helpers
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 22:31:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43070157-cfc3-4ef2-8b2a-e677515e8bce@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68ba3c9f508ed_75e3100ef@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch>
On 5/9/25 11:27, dan.j.williams@intel.com wrote:
> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> [..]
>>> +static void set_ide_sel_ctl(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_ide *ide, int pos,
>>> + bool enable)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 val = FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_ID, ide->stream_id) |
>>> + FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_CFG_EN, pdev->ide_cfg) |
>>
>> There was:
>> FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_DEFAULT, 1) |
>>
>> and now it is gone, why? And it is not in any change log, took me a while to find out what broke.
>
> Oh, sorry, it results from this feedback.
>
> http://lore.kernel.org/9683c850-3152-4da5-97f1-3e86ba39e8d3@nvidia.com
>
> ...but since the address association registers are not programmed then
> nothing routes TLPs to the IDE stream. My mistake.
>
> We may eventually need the ability for the stream allocation path to also
> allocate a traffic class in the root-port, but for now this assumes single
> device TC==0.
>
> For now I am adding this:
>
> -- 8< --
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/ide.c b/drivers/pci/ide.c
> index 4f5aa42e05ef..610603865d9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/ide.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/ide.c
> @@ -379,10 +379,12 @@ struct pci_ide_partner *pci_ide_to_settings(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_ide
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ide_to_settings);
>
> -static void set_ide_sel_ctl(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_ide *ide, int pos,
> +static void set_ide_sel_ctl(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_ide *ide,
> + struct pci_ide_partner *settings, int pos,
> bool enable)
> {
> u32 val = FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_ID, ide->stream_id) |
> + FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_DEFAULT, settings->default_stream) |
> FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_CFG_EN, pdev->ide_cfg) |
> FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_TEE_LIMITED, pdev->ide_tee_limit) |
> FIELD_PREP(PCI_IDE_SEL_CTL_EN, enable);
> @@ -424,7 +426,7 @@ void pci_ide_stream_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_ide *ide)
> * Setup control register early for devices that expect
> * stream_id is set during key programming.
> */
> - set_ide_sel_ctl(pdev, ide, pos, false);
> + set_ide_sel_ctl(pdev, ide, settings, pos, false);
> settings->setup = 1;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ide_stream_setup);
> @@ -481,12 +483,12 @@ int pci_ide_stream_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct pci_ide *ide)
>
> pos = sel_ide_offset(pdev, settings);
>
> - set_ide_sel_ctl(pdev, ide, pos, true);
> + set_ide_sel_ctl(pdev, ide, settings, pos, true);
>
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pos + PCI_IDE_SEL_STS, &val);
> if (FIELD_GET(PCI_IDE_SEL_STS_STATE, val) !=
> PCI_IDE_SEL_STS_STATE_SECURE) {
> - set_ide_sel_ctl(pdev, ide, pos, false);
> + set_ide_sel_ctl(pdev, ide, settings, pos, false);
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ide.h b/include/linux/pci-ide.h
> index cf1f7a10e8e0..a2d3fb4a289b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-ide.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-ide.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ enum pci_ide_partner_select {
> * @rid_start: Partner Port Requester ID range start
> * @rid_start: Partner Port Requester ID range end
> * @stream_index: Selective IDE Stream Register Block selection
> + * @default_stream: Endpoint uses this stream for all upstream TLPs regardless of
> + * address and RID association registers
> * @setup: flag to track whether to run pci_ide_stream_teardown() for this
> * partner slot
> * @enable: flag whether to run pci_ide_stream_disable() for this partner slot
> @@ -32,6 +34,7 @@ struct pci_ide_partner {
> u16 rid_start;
> u16 rid_end;
> u8 stream_index;
> + unsigned int default_stream:1;
This sets "Default" on both ends and the rootport does not need it in my setup (it does not seem to affect anything though) - the rootport always knows the stream ID from the RMP entry of a MMIO being accessed. May be move it to pci_ide_partner? Thanks,
> unsigned int setup:1;
> unsigned int enable:1;
> };
--
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 3:51 [PATCH v5 00/10] PCI/TSM: Core infrastructure for PCI device security (TDISP) Dan Williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] coco/tsm: Introduce a core device for TEE Security Managers Dan Williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] PCI/IDE: Enumerate Selective Stream IDE capabilities Dan Williams
2025-09-15 16:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 23:32 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] PCI: Introduce pci_walk_bus_reverse(), for_each_pci_dev_reverse() Dan Williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] PCI/TSM: Authenticate devices via platform TSM Dan Williams
2025-08-27 13:25 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-29 1:06 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-29 1:58 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 0:50 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-05 3:34 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-06 2:07 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-08 6:13 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-09 0:41 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-09 1:35 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-09 1:52 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-10 10:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-10 15:45 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-28 11:43 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-29 1:23 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-30 13:26 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 0:51 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-02 15:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-09-03 2:03 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 20:06 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-05 19:13 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-02 15:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-09-03 2:07 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 20:13 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-08 11:19 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 20:03 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-03 2:17 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 20:35 ` dan.j.williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] samples/devsec: Introduce a PCI device-security bus + endpoint sample Dan Williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] PCI: Add PCIe Device 3 Extended Capability enumeration Dan Williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] PCI/IDE: Add IDE establishment helpers Dan Williams
2025-09-02 1:29 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-02 1:54 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 1:40 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-05 2:14 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-06 2:00 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-08 6:25 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-09 0:42 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-15 11:46 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-10-17 4:06 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-10-17 4:40 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-17 11:15 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-09-05 1:27 ` dan.j.williams
2025-09-05 2:23 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-10-17 11:31 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2025-10-17 19:18 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-28 23:00 ` dan.j.williams
2025-10-29 8:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] PCI/IDE: Report available IDE streams Dan Williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] PCI/TSM: Report active " Dan Williams
2025-08-27 3:51 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] samples/devsec: Add sample IDE establishment Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43070157-cfc3-4ef2-8b2a-e677515e8bce@amd.com \
--to=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox