From: Ali Tariq <alitariq45892@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: starfive: Fix resource leaks on error paths in host_init()
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:49:34 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4502b089-3625-445a-84a0-bee74735f7ac@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714115343.4D49E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
This is a separate, unrelated issue from the submitted patch. I will
work on this and will submit a separate patch.
On 7/14/26 4:53 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Use-after-free of IRQ domains during driver unbind or when probe fails after interrupt initialization.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] PCI: starfive: Fix resource leaks on error paths in host_init() ---
> commit 64603196409722c49e238cd53d9d6a6b7efd0b22
> Author: Ali Tariq <alitariq45892@gmail.com>
>
> PCI: starfive: Fix resource leaks on error paths in host_init()
>
> This commit unwinds previously acquired PHY and clock/reset resources in
> starfive_pcie_host_init() when subsequent initialization steps or regulator
> enablement fails.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-starfive.c b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-starfive.c
>> index 298036c3e7f94..86b248a1ea758 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-starfive.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-starfive.c
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -303,13 +303,19 @@ static int starfive_pcie_host_init(struct plda_pcie_rp *plda)
>> STG_SYSCON_CLKREQ, STG_SYSCON_CLKREQ);
>>
>> ret = starfive_pcie_clk_rst_init(pcie);
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (ret) {
>> + starfive_pcie_disable_phy(pcie);
>> return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> if (pcie->vpcie3v3) {
>> ret = regulator_enable(pcie->vpcie3v3);
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (ret) {
>> dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to enable vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
>> + starfive_pcie_clk_rst_deinit(pcie);
>> + starfive_pcie_disable_phy(pcie);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> }
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are fixing error paths in the
> host initialization, I noticed a potential use-after-free in the related
> PLDA host initialization code.
>
> In drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-plda-host.c, plda_init_interrupts()
> allocates the interrupt using devm_request_irq():
>
> plda_init_interrupts() {
> ...
> ret = devm_request_irq(dev, event_irq,
> plda_event_handler,
> 0, NULL, port);
> ...
> }
>
> However, on device removal or if probe fails, plda_pcie_host_init() calls
> plda_pcie_irq_domain_deinit(), which explicitly removes and frees the event
> domain:
>
> plda_pcie_host_init() {
> ...
> err_probe:
> plda_pcie_irq_domain_deinit(port);
> ...
> }
>
> plda_pcie_irq_domain_deinit() {
> ...
> irq_domain_remove(pcie->event_domain);
> ...
> }
>
> Because the IRQs are devm-managed, their cleanup is deferred until after the
> driver's probe or remove function returns.
>
> When devres eventually calls free_irq(), will the IRQ core attempt to
> deactivate the interrupt using the now-freed irq_data->domain pointer?
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 11:30 [PATCH] PCI: starfive: Fix resource leaks on error paths in host_init() Ali Tariq
2026-07-14 11:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 15:49 ` Ali Tariq [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4502b089-3625-445a-84a0-bee74735f7ac@gmail.com \
--to=alitariq45892@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox