From: xxm <xxm@rock-chips.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, pali@kernel.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] PCI: rockchip: Add Rockchip RK356X host controller driver
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:08:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46b3f277-2bde-321d-b616-3f3b41259e4d@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210623143333.GA15104@lpieralisi>
Hi,
在 2021/6/23 22:33, Lorenzo Pieralisi 写道:
> [+Pali]
>
> On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 10:35:44AM +0800, Simon Xue wrote:
>> Add a driver for the DesignWare-based PCIe controller found on
>> RK356X. The existing pcie-rockchip-host driver is only used for
>> the Rockchip-designed IP found on RK3399.
>>
>> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> I will remove this tag - it does not make sense on a patch adding
> a new driver.
>
> [...]
>
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> +{
>> + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
>> +
>> + /* Reset device */
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 0);
>> +
>> + rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(rockchip);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * PCIe requires the refclk to be stable for 100µs prior to releasing
>> + * PERST. See table 2-4 in section 2.6.2 AC Specifications of the PCI
>> + * Express Card Electromechanical Specification, 1.1. However, we don't
>> + * know if the refclk is coming from RC's PHY or external OSC. If it's
>> + * from RC, so enabling LTSSM is the just right place to release #PERST.
>> + * We need more extra time as before, rather than setting just
>> + * 100us as we don't know how long should the device need to reset.
>> + */
>> + msleep(100);
> Any rationale behind the time chosen ?
We found some device need about 30ms, so 100ms here just leave more room
for other devices.
> Ongoing discussion:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210531090540.2663171-1-luca@lucaceresoli.net
>
> Lorenzo
>
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 1);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
>> + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + /* LTSSM enable control mode */
>> + val = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
>> + val |= PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE | (PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE << 16);
>> + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
>> +
>> + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE,
>> + PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops rockchip_pcie_host_ops = {
>> + .host_init = rockchip_pcie_host_init,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_clk_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &rockchip->clks);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + rockchip->clk_cnt = ret;
>> +
>> + return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_resource_get(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> +{
>> + rockchip->apb_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "apb");
>> + if (IS_ERR(rockchip->apb_base))
>> + return PTR_ERR(rockchip->apb_base);
>> +
>> + rockchip->rst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "reset",
>> + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rockchip->rst_gpio))
>> + return PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst_gpio);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + rockchip->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pcie-phy");
>> + if (IS_ERR(rockchip->phy))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->phy),
>> + "missing PHY\n");
>> +
>> + ret = phy_init(rockchip->phy);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = phy_power_on(rockchip->phy);
>> + if (ret)
>> + phy_exit(rockchip->phy);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> +{
>> + phy_exit(rockchip->phy);
>> + phy_power_off(rockchip->phy);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_reset_control_release(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
>> +
>> + rockchip->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(rockchip->rst))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst),
>> + "failed to get reset lines\n");
>> +
>> + return reset_control_deassert(rockchip->rst);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>> + .link_up = rockchip_pcie_link_up,
>> + .start_link = rockchip_pcie_start_link,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip;
>> + struct pcie_port *pp;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + rockchip = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rockchip), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!rockchip)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rockchip);
>> +
>> + rockchip->pci.dev = dev;
>> + rockchip->pci.ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
>> +
>> + pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
>> + pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
>> +
>> + ret = rockchip_pcie_resource_get(pdev, rockchip);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* DON'T MOVE ME: must be enable before PHY init */
>> + rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
>> + if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>> + if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3) != -ENODEV)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3),
>> + "failed to get vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
>> +
>> + ret = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = rockchip_pcie_phy_init(rockchip);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto disable_regulator;
>> +
>> + ret = rockchip_pcie_reset_control_release(rockchip);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto deinit_phy;
>> +
>> + ret = rockchip_pcie_clk_init(rockchip);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto deinit_phy;
>> +
>> + ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
>> +deinit_phy:
>> + rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(rockchip);
>> +disable_regulator:
>> + regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pcie_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", },
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver rockchip_pcie_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "rockchip-dw-pcie",
>> + .of_match_table = rockchip_pcie_of_match,
>> + .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>> + },
>> + .probe = rockchip_pcie_probe,
>> +};
>> +builtin_platform_driver(rockchip_pcie_driver);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 2:34 [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Simon Xue
2021-05-06 2:35 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] PCI: rockchip: Add Rockchip RK356X host controller driver Simon Xue
2021-06-23 14:33 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-06-24 2:08 ` xxm [this message]
2021-06-24 8:23 ` Pali Rohár
2021-06-24 8:58 ` xxm
2021-06-23 21:15 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-27 15:41 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46b3f277-2bde-321d-b616-3f3b41259e4d@rock-chips.com \
--to=xxm@rock-chips.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox