From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:53656 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965081AbbBCM6F (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 07:58:05 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Marc Zyngier Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Jiang Liu , Bjorn Helgaas , Andre Przywara , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Fix pcibios_update_irq misuse of irq number Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:57:17 +0100 Message-ID: <47577254.MGNlDcIDBf@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <54D0B2FA.9080600@arm.com> References: <1422456683-797-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <4324891.mqG6Yyfi6J@wuerfel> <54D0B2FA.9080600@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 03 February 2015 11:37:30 Marc Zyngier wrote: > Side question: In the probe-only case, should we still allow this write > to happen? No, my understanding is that PCI_PROBE_ONLY precisely means that we do not modify the config space and instead trust what is there to be sensible. Arnd