From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
jingoohan1@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
kw@linux.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
frank.li@nxp.com, quic_krichai@quicinc.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: dwc: Clean up some unnecessary codes in dw_pcie_suspend_noirq()
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:47:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48988ec4-06a9-447b-bdd5-be35f31a5488@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241209073924.2155933-4-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
On 12/9/24 16:39, Richard Zhu wrote:
> Before sending PME_TURN_OFF, don't test the LTSSM state. Since it's safe
> to send PME_TURN_OFF message regardless of whether the link is up or
> down. So, there would be no need to test the LTSSM state before sending
> PME_TURN_OFF message.
>
> Only print the message when ltssm_stat is not in DETECT and POLL.
> In the other words, there isn't an error message when no endpoint is
> connected at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 38 +++++++++++--------
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index 14e95c2952bbe..02e0e8c255c70 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -982,25 +982,31 @@ int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> if (dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1)
> return 0;
>
> - /* Only send out PME_TURN_OFF when PCIE link is up */
> - if (dw_pcie_get_ltssm(pci) > DW_PCIE_LTSSM_DETECT_ACT) {
> - if (pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off)
> - pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off(&pci->pp);
> - else
> - ret = dw_pcie_pme_turn_off(pci);
> -
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off)
> + pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off(&pci->pp);
> + else
> + ret = dw_pcie_pme_turn_off(pci);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
ret is always 0 for the "if (pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off)" case. So this test of
"if (ret) return ret" should really go inside the "else", and the initialization
of ret to 0 on declaration can be removed too.
>
> - ret = read_poll_timeout(dw_pcie_get_ltssm, val, val == DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_IDLE,
> - PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
> - PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US, false, pci);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(pci->dev, "Timeout waiting for L2 entry! LTSSM: 0x%x\n", val);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + ret = read_poll_timeout(dw_pcie_get_ltssm, val,
> + val == DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_IDLE ||
> + val <= DW_PCIE_LTSSM_DETECT_WAIT,
> + PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/10,
> + PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US, false, pci);
> + if (ret) {
> + /* Only dump message when ltssm_stat isn't in DETECT and POLL */
> + dev_err(pci->dev, "Timeout waiting for L2 entry! LTSSM: 0x%x\n", val);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Refer to r6.0, sec 5.3.3.2.1, software should wait at least
> + * 100ns after L2/L3 Ready before turning off refclock and
> + * main power. It's harmless too when no endpoint connected.
> + */
> + udelay(1);
> +
> dw_pcie_stop_link(pci);
> if (pci->pp.ops->deinit)
> pci->pp.ops->deinit(&pci->pp);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 5c14ed2cb91ed..7efcb4af66da3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ enum dw_pcie_ltssm {
> /* Need to align with PCIE_PORT_DEBUG0 bits 0:5 */
> DW_PCIE_LTSSM_DETECT_QUIET = 0x0,
> DW_PCIE_LTSSM_DETECT_ACT = 0x1,
> + DW_PCIE_LTSSM_DETECT_WAIT = 0x6,
> DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L0 = 0x11,
> DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_IDLE = 0x15,
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 7:39 [PATCH v3 0/3] Bug fixes when dwc generic suspend/resume callbacks are used Richard Zhu
2024-12-09 7:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: dwc: Fix resume failure if no EP is connected on some platforms Richard Zhu
2024-12-09 8:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-12-10 2:31 ` Hongxing Zhu
2024-12-09 7:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI: dwc: Always stop link in the dw_pcie_suspend_noirq Richard Zhu
2024-12-09 7:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: dwc: Clean up some unnecessary codes in dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() Richard Zhu
2024-12-09 8:47 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-12-10 2:29 ` Hongxing Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48988ec4-06a9-447b-bdd5-be35f31a5488@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox