From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] PCI, ACPI, x86: MMCFG support for hotpluggable PCI hostbridges on x86, x86_64
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:20:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F805B32.1080401@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120406201628.1621752c.izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
On 04/06/2012 07:16 PM, Taku Izumi wrote:
>
> This patch introduces the configuration for the base address of
> the memory mapped configuration space (MMCFG) for hotpluggable PCI
> hostbridges on x86 and x86_64.
>
> The MMCFG for hotpluggable host bridges must be described by using
> ACPI _CBA method. This patch adds implementation for _CBA method
> on ACPI pci_root driver and MMCFG manipulating functons for x86 and
> x86_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/acpi/acnames.h | 1
> include/linux/pci.h | 3 ++
> 5 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-next-build/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-next-build.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ linux-next-build/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_osc_control_set);
>
> static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> - unsigned long long segment, bus;
> + unsigned long long segment, bus, base_addr;
> acpi_status status;
> int result;
> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> @@ -506,6 +506,28 @@ static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(s
> device->driver_data = root;
>
> /*
> + * Check _CBA for hot pluggable host bridge
> + */
> + base_addr = 0;
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CBA, NULL,
> + &base_addr);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _CBA\n");
> + result = -ENODEV;
> + goto end;
> + }
> + if (base_addr) {
> + result = pci_add_mmcfg_region(root->segment,
> + root->secondary.start,
> + root->secondary.end,
> + base_addr);
> + if (result) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't add MMCFG entry\n");
> + goto end;
> + }
The MMCFG information for host bridges present at boot time should have already
been added by __pci_mmcfg_init() when acpi_pci_root_add() is called.
So it would be better for pci_add_mmcfg_region() to return -EEXIST for host
bridges present at boot time.
> + }
> +
> + /*
> * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> * PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
> */
> @@ -625,6 +647,8 @@ static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(s
> return 0;
>
> end:
> + if (base_addr)
> + pci_remove_mmcfg_region(root->segment, root->secondary.start);
> if (!list_empty(&root->node))
> list_del(&root->node);
> kfree(root);
> @@ -646,6 +670,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_remove(struct a
> device_set_run_wake(root->bus->bridge, false);
> pci_acpi_remove_bus_pm_notifier(device);
>
> + pci_remove_mmcfg_region(root->segment, root->secondary.start);
> +
It would be better to only call pci_remove_mmcfg_region() if the host bridge has _CBA
method available, otherwise we have no way to recover this MMCFG information and
can't rebind the pci_root driver to a pci host bridge after an unbinding operation.
> kfree(root);
> return 0;
> }
> Index: linux-next-build/include/acpi/acnames.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-next-build.orig/include/acpi/acnames.h
> +++ linux-next-build/include/acpi/acnames.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
> #define METHOD_NAME__AEI "_AEI"
> #define METHOD_NAME__PRW "_PRW"
> #define METHOD_NAME__SRS "_SRS"
> +#define METHOD_NAME__CBA "_CBA"
>
> /* Method names - these methods must appear at the namespace root */
>
> Index: linux-next-build/include/linux/pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-next-build.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ linux-next-build/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1460,6 +1460,9 @@ void pcibios_disable_device(struct pci_d
> void pcibios_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev);
> int pcibios_set_pcie_reset_state(struct pci_dev *dev,
> enum pcie_reset_state state);
> +int pci_add_mmcfg_region(int segment, int start,
> + int end, u64 addr);
> +void pci_remove_mmcfg_region(int segment, int bus);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
> extern void __init pci_mmcfg_early_init(void);
> Index: linux-next-build/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-next-build.orig/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> +++ linux-next-build/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int __initdata pci_mmcfg_resource
>
> LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list);
>
> -static __init void pci_mmconfig_remove(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
> +static __devinit void pci_mmconfig_remove(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
> {
> if (cfg->res.parent)
> release_resource(&cfg->res);
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static __init void free_all_mmcfg(void)
> pci_mmconfig_remove(cfg);
> }
>
> -static __init void list_add_sorted(struct pci_mmcfg_region *new)
> +static __devinit void list_add_sorted(struct pci_mmcfg_region *new)
> {
> struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
>
> @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ static __init void list_add_sorted(struc
> list_add_tail(&new->list, &pci_mmcfg_list);
> }
>
> -static __init struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_add(int segment, int start,
> - int end, u64 addr)
> +static __devinit struct pci_mmcfg_region *pci_mmconfig_add(int segment,
> + int start, int end, u64 addr)
> {
> struct pci_mmcfg_region *new;
> struct resource *res;
> @@ -357,8 +357,10 @@ static void __init pci_mmcfg_insert_reso
> {
> struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list)
> - insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &cfg->res);
> + list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) {
> + if (!cfg->res.parent)
> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &cfg->res);
> + }
>
> /* Mark that the resources have been inserted. */
> pci_mmcfg_resources_inserted = 1;
> @@ -401,7 +403,7 @@ static acpi_status __init check_mcfg_res
> return AE_OK;
> }
>
> -static acpi_status __init find_mboard_resource(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
> +static acpi_status __devinit find_mboard_resource(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl,
> void *context, void **rv)
> {
> struct resource *mcfg_res = context;
> @@ -415,7 +417,7 @@ static acpi_status __init find_mboard_re
> return AE_OK;
> }
>
> -static int __init is_acpi_reserved(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned not_used)
> +static int __devinit is_acpi_reserved(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned not_used)
> {
> struct resource mcfg_res;
>
> @@ -434,8 +436,9 @@ static int __init is_acpi_reserved(u64 s
>
> typedef int (*check_reserved_t)(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned type);
>
> -static int __init is_mmconf_reserved(check_reserved_t is_reserved,
> - struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg, int with_e820)
> +static int __devinit is_mmconf_reserved(check_reserved_t is_reserved,
> + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg,
> + int with_e820)
> {
> u64 addr = cfg->res.start;
> u64 size = resource_size(&cfg->res);
> @@ -580,6 +583,44 @@ static int __init pci_parse_mcfg(struct
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int pci_add_mmcfg_region(int segment, int start, int end, u64 addr)
> +{
> + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> + int valid;
> +
> + cfg = pci_mmconfig_add(segment, start, end, addr);
> + if (!cfg) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
> + "no memory for MMCFG entry\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + valid = is_mmconf_reserved(is_acpi_reserved, cfg, 0);
> + if (!valid) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR FW_BUG PREFIX
> + "MMCONFIG at %pR not reserved in "
> + "ACPI motherboard resources\n",
> + &cfg->res);
> + pci_mmconfig_remove(cfg);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &cfg->res);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void pci_remove_mmcfg_region(int segment, int bus)
> +{
> + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg;
> +
> + cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(segment, bus);
> + if (!cfg)
> + return;
> +
> + pci_mmconfig_remove(cfg);
> +}
> +
> static void __init __pci_mmcfg_init(int early)
> {
> /* MMCONFIG disabled */
> Index: linux-next-build/drivers/pci/pci.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-next-build.orig/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ linux-next-build/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,37 @@ unsigned long pci_hotplug_mem_size = DEF
>
> enum pcie_bus_config_types pcie_bus_config = PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF;
>
> +/**
> + *
> + * pci_add_mmcfg_region
> + * @segment: segment number
> + * @start: start bus number
> + * @end: end bus number
> + * @addr: base address
> + *
> + * Add MMCONFIG entry for specified segment or bus range group
> + *
> + * This is the default implementation. Architecture implementations
> + * can override this.
> + */
> +int __attribute__ ((weak)) pci_add_mmcfg_region(int segment, int start,
> + int end, u64 addr)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * pci_remove_mmcfg_region
> + * @segment: segment number
> + * @bus: bus number
> + *
> + * Remove MMCONFIG entry for specified segment or bus range group
> + *
> + * This is the default implementation. Architecture implementations
> + * can override this.
> + */
> +void __attribute__ ((weak)) pci_remove_mmcfg_region(int segment, int bus) {}
> +
> /*
> * The default CLS is used if arch didn't set CLS explicitly and not
> * all pci devices agree on the same value. Arch can override either
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-07 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-06 2:59 [PATCH] [RFC] PCI, ACPI, x86: MMCFG support for hotpluggable PCI hostbridges on x86, x86_64 Taku Izumi
2012-04-06 6:31 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2012-04-06 11:15 ` Taku Izumi
2012-04-06 11:16 ` Taku Izumi
2012-04-07 15:20 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-04-25 17:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-26 2:55 ` Taku Izumi
2012-04-07 15:09 ` Jiang Liu
2012-04-08 17:12 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] PCI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging PCI host bridges Jiang Liu
2012-04-25 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-04-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI,x86: introduce new MMCFG interfaces to support PCI host bridge hotplug Jiang Liu
2012-04-08 19:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-08 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI, ACPI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging PCI host bridges Jiang Liu
2012-04-08 19:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-09 3:43 ` Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 14:37 ` Jiang Liu
2012-04-09 15:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-09 20:48 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-09 11:43 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2012-04-09 16:02 ` Jiang Liu
2012-04-10 10:32 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2012-04-10 15:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-04-10 16:05 ` Jiang Liu
2012-04-10 16:01 ` Jiang Liu
2012-05-02 23:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-03 6:39 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F805B32.1080401@gmail.com \
--to=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).