linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: "Sosnowski, Maciej" <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com>
Cc: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Keping Chen <chenkeping@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND,PATCH] DCA, x86: fix invalid memory access in DCA core
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:30:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB65D0E.9060004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <436EC33EF05C3442BBF5497FC9483FF4162732ED@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 05/18/2012 10:10 PM, Sosnowski, Maciej wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, May 10, 2012 3:59 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Maciej,
>> 	I feel we may also need to tune the multiple IOH support in DCA.
>> Multiple IOH support is disabled for CB3.0 devices, how about CB3.1 devices
>> in Ivrbridge or SandyBridge? Does the hardware limitation still exist? Or
>> could we support multiple IOHs with IvyBridge and SandyBridge?
>> 	If multiple IOH is supported, I think we should move the logic to
>> disable multiple IOH support for CB3.0 from DCA core into ioatdma. I have
>> also prepared two patches for that two.
>> 	Thanks!
>>
> 
> At this point I do not think we would need to tune multiple IOH for DCA.
> The limitation you mention applies only to CB3.0. I do not think DCA is supported
> with Sandy Bridge / Ivy Bridge regardless of multi-IOH case but let me confirm it
> yet.
It seems that Intel introduces DDIO technology for IvyBridge. Does it replace DCA
technology on new platforms?
Thanks!

> 
> Thanks,
> Maciej


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-18 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-07 15:58 [RESEND,PATCH] DCA, x86: fix invalid memory access in DCA core Jiang Liu
2012-05-09 15:24 ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2012-05-10  1:59   ` Jiang Liu
2012-05-18 14:10     ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2012-05-18 14:30       ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-05-23 15:11         ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2012-05-18 14:04 ` Sosnowski, Maciej
2012-05-18 14:49   ` Jiang Liu
2012-05-21 12:27   ` Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FB65D0E.9060004@gmail.com \
    --to=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenkeping@huawei.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.sosnowski@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).