From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xudong.hao@linux.intel.com,
yu.zhao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Remove redundant checking in PCI Express capability routines
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:02:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC93BDF.8050900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120601211631.20328.53913.stgit@amt.stowe>
On 06/01/2012 05:16 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
> There are a number of redundant pci_is_pcie() checks in various PCI
> Express capabilities related routines like the following:
>
> if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> return false;
>
> pos = pci_pcie_cap(dev);
> if (!pos)
> return false;
>
> The current pci_is_pcie() implementation is merely:
>
> static inline bool pci_is_pcie(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> return !!pci_pcie_cap(dev);
> }
>
> so we can just drop the pci_is_pcie() test in such cases.
>
> Suggested by Bjorn Helgaas in -
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130463494319762&w=2
>
> Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe<myron.stowe@redhat.com>
> ---
>
you can add my ack to this patch.
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 14 +-------------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 64471b1..ff0beb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1995,7 +1995,7 @@ void pci_enable_ari(struct pci_dev *dev)
> return;
>
> bridge = dev->bus->self;
> - if (!bridge || !pci_is_pcie(bridge))
> + if (!bridge)
> return;
>
> pos = pci_pcie_cap(bridge);
> @@ -2055,9 +2055,6 @@ void pci_disable_ido(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned long type)
> int pos;
> u16 ctrl;
>
> - if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> - return;
> -
> pos = pci_pcie_cap(dev);
> if (!pos)
> return;
> @@ -2097,9 +2094,6 @@ int pci_enable_obff(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_obff_signal_type type)
> u16 ctrl;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> -
> pos = pci_pcie_cap(dev);
> if (!pos)
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> @@ -2150,9 +2144,6 @@ void pci_disable_obff(struct pci_dev *dev)
> int pos;
> u16 ctrl;
>
> - if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> - return;
> -
> pos = pci_pcie_cap(dev);
> if (!pos)
> return;
> @@ -2175,9 +2166,6 @@ static bool pci_ltr_supported(struct pci_dev *dev)
> int pos;
> u32 cap;
>
> - if (!pci_is_pcie(dev))
> - return false;
> -
> pos = pci_pcie_cap(dev);
> if (!pos)
> return false;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-01 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-01 21:16 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: PCIe capability structure related cleanup/fixes Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: make pci_ltr_supported static Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 22:02 ` Don Dutile
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Remove redundant checking in PCI Express capability routines Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 22:02 ` Don Dutile [this message]
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: Add pci_pcie_cap2() check for PCIe feature capabilities >= v2 Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 21:58 ` Don Dutile
2012-06-01 21:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: Remove redundant capabilities checking in pci_{save, restore}_pcie_state Myron Stowe
2012-06-01 22:00 ` Don Dutile
2012-06-12 2:52 ` [PATCH 0/4] PCI: PCIe capability structure related cleanup/fixes Bjorn Helgaas
2012-06-12 16:34 ` Myron Stowe
2012-06-12 16:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC93BDF.8050900@redhat.com \
--to=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yu.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).