From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net (009.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A63141CC8B3; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730408146; cv=none; b=gM6KgDcvUG20Kd70L5smkXzgD1fYNJj1x4A5wkEVCoWf7isqpY3/Ek2KaDvVabcGvxBNWX6xkGvT5VwGJEPjEIuxmX9mmTxqxSRmVPGd0YpXRC0GwhvkmfDr/FW4IE4v+RtRNw8040pD9iNp+PK75rjjchaSMU7EGSarj5RGQ8U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730408146; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Vx/GpNQjaPyOsXHD40m4L/SC/SsXyalg3igIGxAFPZQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=M2luBDeeXre3+YfyShK56TiSFgkfN3Pvq7BP7stCvyevqh8IkrAmznUULC9zeqs5tSy+BzffABhOqmZwACW/C1Ypyvi3QhFeF6bSl37AhVAOFF5CdADzxw8TaHdffCBaXgdh/SYX9kbvdHPkot4UD/A4vIbZnfJDYNhMLk4JHp8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=ZtIOVQTD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="ZtIOVQTD" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XfbqT6Dh1zlgMVS; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:55:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1730408124; x=1733000125; bh=B/pEQTczTiq8UIkWg7TPO3VM Ag1G//4dSD/mob7u6xE=; b=ZtIOVQTDUxy4QOQyeqVfTWcwWtIKOOg1Jac03tiI A7rCqvb9vtKSHPFTp3wF/OdOCTXggfRQmjW1Xz2AyQuoNB4AiXSB6jL3uB70g+in 79BqU7XO0OVtBFrfJD3PLeY1HqTIVPag3Az5jepT8ofoaTAMY/ewHawQhH4R+bvg NqlDCexeZlHL8u4+B7neARRpjrmuBRu8CaY9eoTp1+/XajADX9rfWmgbndjW9rLQ XuadQP3u1OUiJL6NnXZlZfO6UYtdFeZQhmbg7NR4i+B2vLIqZ50DBphSoU0yOLfj +sqOmryDNyCHXB3zQKpW/jPG+KIxEnZasIOEgmoiYq7Z1g== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (009.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id 27aSEBHRr0Fw; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Xfbq63bYdzlgTWK; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4c7e679a-d3e6-4426-a679-ee581b5c728c@acm.org> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 13:55:11 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] block: share more code for bio addition helpers To: Leon Romanovsky , Jens Axboe , Jason Gunthorpe , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg Cc: Keith Busch , Bjorn Helgaas , Logan Gunthorpe , Yishai Hadas , Shameer Kolothum , Kevin Tian , Alex Williamson , Marek Szyprowski , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/27/24 7:21 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > +static int bio_add_zone_append_page_int(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, > + unsigned int len, unsigned int offset, bool *same_page) > +{ > + struct block_device *bdev = bio->bi_bdev; > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_op(bio) != REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND)) > + return 0; > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bdev_is_zoned(bdev))) > + return 0; > + return bio_add_hw_page(bdev_get_queue(bdev), bio, page, len, offset, > + bdev_max_zone_append_sectors(bdev), same_page); > +} Does "_int" stand for "_internal"? If so, please consider changing it into "_impl". I think that will prevent that anyone confuses this suffix with the "int" data type. Thanks, Bart.