From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@oracle.com>,
poza@codeaurora.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] pciehp: Ignore link events during DPC event
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:07:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e4ed7cd-3ec4-3271-04f7-623a2d4b4cfe@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831225948.GF9677@localhost.localdomain>
On 8/31/2018 3:59 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 03:55:58PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 8/31/2018 3:33 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> Darn, you're right. The kernel allocates up to 32 vectors and the port is
>>> free to divvy them up however it wants amont its supported services. It
>>> just so happened most of the ports I tested used the same one. There's
>>> no way to really close this race if they are separate vectors though,
>>> so maybe just leave this as a 'best effort' approach and update the
>>> change log accodingly.
>>
>> or take the big hammer and move them into a single workqueue?
>
> That wouldn't really help if they're different interrupt vectors since
> they could happen in either order with a delay between the CPU seeing
> each of them.
>
I was trying to make it look like single interrupt in software even though
they are sourced from different interrupt handlers.
But, you are right. Interrupts can arrive in arbitrary order.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-01 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-31 21:26 [PATCH 00/16] PCI, error handling and hot plug Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 01/16] PCI: Simplify disconnected marking Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 02/16] PCI: Fix pci_reset_bus Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:52 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-31 22:08 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 03/16] PCI/AER: Remove dead code Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 04/16] PCI/ERR: Use slot reset if available Keith Busch
2018-09-01 17:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-04 14:53 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 05/16] PCI/ERR: Handle fatal error recovery Keith Busch
2018-09-01 8:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-05 5:56 ` poza
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 06/16] PCI/ERR: Remove devices on recovery failure Keith Busch
2018-08-31 22:26 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 07/16] PCI/ERR: Always use the first downstream port Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 08/16] PCI/ERR: Simplify broadcast callouts Keith Busch
2018-09-01 8:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 09/16] PCI/ERR: Report current recovery status for udev Keith Busch
2018-09-01 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 10/16] PCI/portdrv: Provide pci error callbacks Keith Busch
2018-09-02 10:16 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-04 21:38 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 11/16] PCI/portdrv: Restore pci state on slot reset Keith Busch
2018-09-02 9:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-04 14:36 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 12/16] PCI/pciehp: Fix powerfault detection order Keith Busch
2018-09-01 15:18 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-04 14:27 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 13/16] PCI/pciehp: Implement error handling callbacks Keith Busch
2018-09-02 10:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-04 14:19 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 14/16] pciehp: Ignore link events during DPC event Keith Busch
2018-08-31 22:18 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-31 22:33 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 22:55 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-31 22:59 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 23:07 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-09-02 14:27 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-04 14:16 ` Keith Busch
2018-09-04 14:40 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-04 15:31 ` Keith Busch
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 15/16] PCI/DPC: Wait for reset complete Keith Busch
2018-08-31 22:15 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-08-31 21:26 ` [PATCH 16/16] PCI: Unify device inaccessible Keith Busch
2018-09-02 14:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2018-09-03 0:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e4ed7cd-3ec4-3271-04f7-623a2d4b4cfe@kernel.org \
--to=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=thomas.tai@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).