From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Kenneth Crudup <kenny@panix.com>,
"Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Ricky Wu <ricky_wu@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Avoid unnecessary device replacement check
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 07:32:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f08e084-db97-4fd2-acf8-c86f4b66b7db@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02f166e24c87d6cde4085865cce9adfdfd969688.1741674172.git.lukas@wunner.de>
On 3/10/25 11:27 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hot-removal of nested PCI hotplug ports suffers from a long-standing
> race condition which can lead to a deadlock: A parent hotplug port
> acquires pci_lock_rescan_remove(), then waits for pciehp to unbind
> from a child hotplug port. Meanwhile that child hotplug port tries to
> acquire pci_lock_rescan_remove() as well in order to remove its own
> children.
>
> The deadlock only occurs if the parent acquires pci_lock_rescan_remove()
> first, not if the child happens to acquire it first.
>
> Several workarounds to avoid the issue have been proposed and discarded
> over the years, e.g.:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/4c882e25194ba8282b78fe963fec8faae7cf23eb.1529173804.git.lukas@wunner.de/
>
> A proper fix is being worked on, but needs more time as it is nontrivial
> and necessarily intrusive.
>
> Recent commit 9d573d19547b ("PCI: pciehp: Detect device replacement
> during system sleep") provokes more frequent occurrence of the deadlock
> when removing more than one Thunderbolt device during system sleep.
> The commit sought to detect device replacement, but also triggered on
> device removal. Differentiating reliably between replacement and
> removal is impossible because pci_get_dsn() returns 0 both if the device
> was removed, as well as if it was replaced with one lacking a Device
> Serial Number.
>
> Avoid the more frequent occurrence of the deadlock by checking whether
> the hotplug port itself was hot-removed. If so, there's no sense in
> checking whether its child device was replaced.
>
> This works because the ->resume_noirq() callback is invoked in top-down
> order for the entire hierarchy: A parent hotplug port detecting device
> replacement (or removal) marks all children as removed using
> pci_dev_set_disconnected() and a child hotplug port can then reliably
> detect being removed.
>
> Fixes: 9d573d19547b ("PCI: pciehp: Detect device replacement during system sleep")
> Reported-by: Kenneth Crudup <kenny@panix.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/83d9302a-f743-43e4-9de2-2dd66d91ab5b@panix.com/
> Reported-by: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan) <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240926125909.2362244-1-acelan.kao@canonical.com/
> Tested-by: Kenneth Crudup <kenny@panix.com>
> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.11+
> ---
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> index ff458e6..997841c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> @@ -286,9 +286,12 @@ static int pciehp_suspend(struct pcie_device *dev)
>
> static bool pciehp_device_replaced(struct controller *ctrl)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *pdev __free(pci_dev_put);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev __free(pci_dev_put) = NULL;
> u32 reg;
>
> + if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(ctrl->pcie->port))
> + return false;
> +
> pdev = pci_get_slot(ctrl->pcie->port->subordinate, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0));
> if (!pdev)
> return true;
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-11 6:27 [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Avoid unnecessary device replacement check Lukas Wunner
2025-03-12 15:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2025-03-12 16:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-14 14:32 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f08e084-db97-4fd2-acf8-c86f4b66b7db@linux.intel.com \
--to=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kenny@panix.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ricky_wu@realtek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox