Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] r8169: enable RTL8168H/RTL8168EP/RTL8168FP/RTL8125/RTL8126 LTR support

Heiner Kallweit
2025-03-01T15:01:31Z

On 24.02.2025 17:33, Hau wrote:
>>
>> External mail : This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
>> reply, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
>> know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21.02.2025 08:18, ChunHao Lin wrote:
>>> This patch will enable RTL8168H/RTL8168EP/RTL8168FP/RTL8125/RTL8126
>>> LTR support on the platforms that have tested with LTR enabled.
>>>
>>
>> Where in the code is the check whether platform has been tested with LTR?
>>
> LTR is for L1,2. But L1 will be disabled when rtl_aspm_is_safe() return false. So LTR needs rtl_aspm_is_safe()
> to return true.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: ChunHao Lin <hau@realtek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 108
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> index 731302361989..9953eaa01c9d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> @@ -2955,6 +2955,111 @@ static void rtl_disable_exit_l1(struct
>> rtl8169_private *tp)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void rtl_set_ltr_latency(struct rtl8169_private *tp) {
>>> + switch (tp->mac_version) {
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70:
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_71:
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd2, 0x8c09);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd8, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd4, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdda, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd6, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcddc, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcde8, 0x887a);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdea, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdec, 0x8c09);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdee, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf0, 0x8a62);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf2, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf4, 0x883e);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf6, 0x9003);
>>> + break;
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_66:
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd2, 0x889c);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd8, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd4, 0x8c30);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdda, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd6, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcddc, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcde8, 0x883e);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdea, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdec, 0x889c);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdee, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf0, 0x8C09);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdf2, 0x9003);
>>> + break;
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_46 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_53:
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd8, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdda, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcddc, 0x9003);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd2, 0x883c);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd4, 0x8c12);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd6, 0x9003);
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtl_reset_pci_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp) {
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = tp->pci_dev;
>>> + u16 cap;
>>> +
>>> + pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &cap);
>>> + if (cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN) {
>>> + pcie_capability_clear_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
>>> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
>>> + pcie_capability_set_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
>>> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
>>
>> I'd prefer that only PCI core deals with these registers (functions like
>> pci_configure_ltr()). Any specific reason for this reset? Is it something which
>> could be applicable for other devices too, so that the PCI core should be
>> extended?
>>
> It is for specific platform. On that platform driver needs to do this to let LTR works.
>
>> +Bjorn and PCI list, to get an opinion from the PCI folks.
>>
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp) {
>>> + switch (tp->mac_version) {
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_71:
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, 0xe034, 0x0000, 0xc000);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, 0xe0a2, 0x0000, BIT(0));
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, 0xe032, 0x0000, BIT(14));
>>> + break;
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_46 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_48:
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_52 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_53:
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, 0xe0a2, 0x0000, BIT(0));
>>> + RTL_W8(tp, 0xb6, RTL_R8(tp, 0xb6) | BIT(0));
>>> + fallthrough;
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_51:
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, 0xe034, 0x0000, 0xc000);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xe02c, 0x1880);
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xe02e, 0x4880);
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + rtl_set_ltr_latency(tp);
>>> +
>>> + /* chip can trigger LTR */
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, 0xe032, 0x0003, BIT(0));
>>> +
>>> + /* reset LTR to notify host */
>>> + rtl_reset_pci_ltr(tp);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void rtl_disable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp) {
>>> + switch (tp->mac_version) {
>>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_46 ... RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_71:
>>> + r8168_mac_ocp_modify(tp, 0xe032, 0x0003, 0);
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
>>> bool enable) {
>>> u8 val8;
>>> @@ -2971,6 +3076,8 @@ static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct
>> rtl8169_private *tp, bool enable)
>>> tp->mac_version == RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_43)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> + rtl_enable_ltr(tp);
>>> +
>>> rtl_mod_config5(tp, 0, ASPM_en);
>>> switch (tp->mac_version) {
>>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_70:
>>> @@ -4821,6 +4928,7 @@ static void rtl8169_down(struct rtl8169_private
>>> *tp)
>>>
>>> rtl8169_cleanup(tp);
>>> rtl_disable_exit_l1(tp);
>>> + rtl_disable_ltr(tp);
>>
>> Any specific reason why LTR isn't configured just once, on driver load?
>>
> It is for device compatibility, I will check internally to see if we can remove it.
>
Thanks. Complementing what I wrote before:
I would understand that reconfiguring LTR may be needed after a hw reset, when chip
"forgets" settings. But is there a reason to disable the internal LTR config?
IOW: What could happen if we omit rtl_disable_ltr()?

>
>>> rtl_prepare_power_down(tp);
>>>
>>> if (tp->dash_type != RTL_DASH_NONE)
>