linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing0307@gmail.com>
To: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/32] PCI: add pcie_flags_reg into struct pci_dev to cache PCIe capabilities register
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 21:47:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50114A5E.5090007@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50100CC4.8010706@redhat.com>

于 2012-07-25 23:12, Don Dutile 写道:
> resending since i did a reply vs reply-all last time...
> 
> On 07/24/2012 12:31 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> From: Yijing Wang<wangyijing@huawei.com>
>>
>> From: Yijing Wang<wangyijing@huawei.com>
>>
>> Since PCI Express Capabilities Register is read only, cache its value
>> into struct pci_dev to avoid repeatedly calling pci_read_config_*().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang<wangyijing@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu<liuj97@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/probe.c |    1 +
>>   include/linux/pci.h |   10 ++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index 6c143b4..6fd58df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -929,6 +929,7 @@ void set_pcie_port_type(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>       pdev->is_pcie = 1;
>>       pdev->pcie_cap = pos;
>>       pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_EXP_FLAGS,&reg16);
>> +    pdev->pcie_flags_reg = reg16;
>>       pdev->pcie_type = (reg16&  PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE)>>  4;
> So, given the patch below, shouldn't the above line be ?
>     pdev->pcie_type = pci_pcie_type(pdev);
> 
Hi,Don Dutile,thanks for your comments very much!
> Missed part of patch ?
pdev->pcie_type was removed in the later patch([RFC PATCH v2 03/32] PCI: remove unused field pcie_type from struct pci_dev),
so I leave it here unmodified.
But your suggestion let this patch become more reasonable.
Thanks.
> 
>>       pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP,&reg16);
>>       pdev->pcie_mpss = reg16&  PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PAYLOAD;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 5faa831..95662b2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
>>       u8        pcie_mpss:3;    /* PCI-E Max Payload Size Supported */
>>       u8        rom_base_reg;    /* which config register controls the ROM */
>>       u8        pin;          /* which interrupt pin this device uses */
>> +    u16        pcie_flags_reg;    /* cached PCI-E Capabilities Register */
>>
>>       struct pci_driver *driver;    /* which driver has allocated this device */
>>       u64        dma_mask;    /* Mask of the bits of bus address this
>> @@ -1650,6 +1651,15 @@ static inline bool pci_is_pcie(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>       return !!pci_pcie_cap(dev);
>>   }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * pci_pcie_type - get the PCIe device/port type
>> + * @dev: PCI device
>> + */
>> +static inline int pci_pcie_type(const struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +    return (dev->pcie_flags_reg&  PCI_EXP_FLAGS_TYPE)>>  4;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void pci_request_acs(void);
>>   bool pci_acs_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 acs_flags);
>>   bool pci_acs_path_enabled(struct pci_dev *start,
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-26 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-24 16:31 [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] provide interfaces to access PCIe capabilities registers Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/32] PCI: add pcie_flags_reg into struct pci_dev to cache PCIe capabilities register Jiang Liu
2012-07-25 15:12   ` Don Dutile
2012-07-26 13:47     ` Yijing Wang [this message]
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/32] PCI: introduce pci_pcie_type(dev) to replace pci_dev->pcie_type Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/32] PCI: remove unused field pcie_type from struct pci_dev Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/32] PCI: add PCIe capabilities access functions to hide differences among PCIe specs Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 21:12   ` Don Dutile
2012-07-29 16:22     ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/32] PCI/core: use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify implementation Jiang Liu
2012-07-25 21:12   ` Don Dutile
2012-07-29  2:12     ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/32] PCI/hotplug: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] PCI/portdrv: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-25  5:51   ` Kaneshige, Kenji
2012-07-25  9:44     ` Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/32] PCI/pciehp: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/32] PCI/PME: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/32] PCI/AER: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/32] PCI/ASPM: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/32] PCI/ARM: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/32] PCI/MIPS: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] PCI/tile: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/32] PCI/r8169: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/32] PCI/broadcom: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/32] PCI/igb: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/32] PCI/vxge: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/32] PCI/mlx4: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/32] PCI/niu: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/32] PCI/myri10ge: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/32] PCI/chelsio: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 16:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/32] PCI/atl1c: " Jiang Liu
2012-07-24 21:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] provide interfaces to access PCIe capabilities registers Don Dutile
2012-07-29  2:26   ` Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50114A5E.5090007@gmail.com \
    --to=wangyijing0307@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).