From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:55944 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753685Ab2HARUS (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:20:18 -0400 Message-ID: <5019654D.2000408@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:20:13 -0600 From: Stephen Warren MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiang Liu , Thierry Reding CC: Bjorn Helgaas , Don Dutile , Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , Jiang Liu , Yinghai Lu , Taku Izumi , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Kenji Kaneshige , Yijing Wang , Russell King , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/32] PCI/ARM: use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify implementation References: <1343836477-7287-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <1343836477-7287-13-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1343836477-7287-13-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/01/2012 09:54 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: > From: Jiang Liu > > Use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify PCIe ARM implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu This is probably fine from my perspective assuming the underlying PCI API implementation is OKd by relevant people. Thierry, can you comment on whether this will conflict with your Tegra PCIe driver series? If it doesn't, this patch can go through any relevant PCI tree. If it does, we may have to take this through the Tegra tree after merging the dependencies, or defer it to later.