From: zhangsenchuan <zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com>
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, will@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device instead of Link up during suspend
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:12:51 +0800 (GMT+08:00) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503961f9.dd6.19a6d0a1e94.Coremail.zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fnayczbumpynzvhafv3ryozlg2qwsxsyzpn5p44kc4o3hy7uux@lp5qgsd6ajtw>
> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>
> Send time:Saturday, 08/11/2025 18:25:36
> To: zhangsenchuan <zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com>
> Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, will@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device instead of Link up during suspend
>
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:27:15PM +0800, zhangsenchuan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Messages-----
> > > From: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>
> > > Send time:Thursday, 06/11/2025 19:57:16
> > > To: zhangsenchuan <zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com>
> > > Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, will@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device instead of Link up during suspend
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 06:13:05PM +0800, zhangsenchuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Messages-----
> > > > > From: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > > Send time:Thursday, 06/11/2025 14:13:25
> > > > > To: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com
> > > > > Cc: will@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com, "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device instead of Link up during suspend
> > > > >
> > > > > The suspend handler checks for the PCIe Link up to decide when to turn off
> > > > > the controller resources. But this check is racy as the PCIe Link can go
> > > > > down just after this check.
> > > > >
> > > > > So use the newly introduced API, pci_root_ports_have_device() that checks
> > > > > for the presence of a device under any of the Root Ports to replace the
> > > > > Link up check.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 6 ++++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > > index 805edbbfe7eb..b2b89e2e4916 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > > @@ -2018,6 +2018,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct qcom_pcie *pcie;
> > > > > + struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
> > > > > int ret = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > @@ -2053,8 +2054,9 @@ static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > > > > * powerdown state. This will affect the lifetime of the storage devices
> > > > > * like NVMe.
> > > > > */
> > > > > - if (!dw_pcie_link_up(pcie->pci)) {
> > > > > - qcom_pcie_host_deinit(&pcie->pci->pp);
> > > > > + pp = &pcie->pci->pp;
> > > > > + if (!pci_root_ports_have_device(pp->bridge->bus)) {
> > > >
> > > > I'm a little confused.
> > > > The pci_root_ports_have_device function can help check if there is any device
> > > > available under the Root Ports, if there is a device available, the resource
> > > > cannot be released, is it also necessary to release resources when entering
> > > > the L2/L3 state?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It is upto the controller driver to decide. Once the link enters L2/L3, the
> > > device will be in D3Cold state. So the controller can just disable all PCIe
> > > resources to save power.
> > >
> > > But it is not possible to transition all PCIe devices to D3Cold during suspend,
> > > for instance NVMe. I'm hoping to fix it too in the coming days.
> > >
> > Hi, Manivannan
> >
> > Thank you for your explanation.
> >
> > By the way, in v5 patch, I removed the dw_pcie_link_up judgment, and currently
> > resources are directly released.
> > At present, i have completed the pcie v5 patch without adding the
> > pci_root_ports_have_device function. Do I need to wait for you to merge it
> > before sending the V5 patch?
> >
>
> I've merged my series to pci/controller/dwc branch. You can use this branch as a
> base for your v5.
>
Hi, Manivannan
Thank you very much for the newly created branch. I have already submitted a v5
patch based on this branch.
Kind regards,
Senchuan Zhang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 6:13 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: dwc: Replace Link up check with device presence in suspend path Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-06 6:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: host-common: Add an API to check for any device under the Root Ports Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-06 9:47 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-11-06 11:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-07 0:12 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-06 6:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device instead of Link up during suspend Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-06 10:13 ` zhangsenchuan
2025-11-06 11:57 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-07 6:27 ` zhangsenchuan
2025-11-08 10:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-10 9:12 ` zhangsenchuan [this message]
2025-11-06 6:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: dwc: Skip PME_Turn_Off and L2/L3 transition if no device is available Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-06 10:02 ` zhangsenchuan
2025-11-06 12:09 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-11-07 3:28 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503961f9.dd6.19a6d0a1e94.Coremail.zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com \
--to=zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).