From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI mini-summit notes
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:41:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5046ADDC.8090707@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5046ABE0.303@redhat.com>
On 09/04/2012 09:33 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 02:02 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [removed cc ksummit-2012-discuss]
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Yinghai Lu<yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Jon Mason<jdmason@kudzu.us> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Bjorn,
>>>>> One of my team member reported another corner case for SR-IOV. There's
>>>>> are two NIC cards in the system driven by the same driver, but one supports
>>>>> SR-IOV and the other doesn't. It runs into trouble if "max_vfs" parameter is
>>>>> set for the NIC driver.
>>>>> --Gerry
>>>>
>>>> I believe it was decided that a per-pf sysfs interface would be used
>>>> to replace the current module parameter that specifies the number of
>>>> vf's. This should enable different numbers of vf's for each physical
>>>> device. The driver interface that was discussed would introduce new
>>>> function pointers for handlers to setup/teardown the vf's. I believe
>>>> this will solve your problem once it has been implemented.
>>>
>>> now we have ixgbe.max_vfs=63
>>>
>>> so if change to per pci device (PF),
>>>
>>> how about having the driver built-in?
>>> what kind of kernel parameters will be passed?
>
> Having the driver built-in won't make a difference.
>
> The model is to have files under sys fs, i.e.,
> /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:03:01.0/[sriov_vf_enable, sriov_vf_disable]
>
> where one echo's the number of vf's one wants to configure for a pf
> into the sriov_vf_enable file; if want to disable/deconfigure the vf's,
> one echo's a 1 to sriov_vf_disable (all or nothing disable).
>
> the pci core will be able to check & filter that the max num of vf's
> is not exceeded. Also looking to add a file like 'sriov_num_vfs' to
> indicate max number of vf's a PF supports. Whether the bus configuration
> supports it (enough mmio space, enough pci bus nums, etc.) won't be
> known until the enable count is written.
>
> I have the code down to create the sysfs files & report the num_vfs.
^^^^ should be 'done' ...
> Hope to have the first enable/disable working within another week.
> The tough part is to re-factor a pf driver that enables/configures pf;
> I'm working with the igb(_main.c) driver right now.
>
> - Don
btw -- what we didn't resolve at summit, and I haven't taken a crack at it yet,
is a method to set the vf-enablement on a per-pf basis at boot time...
-- kernel cmdline (sounds knarly for large PCIe config)
-- /etc/module.d/sriov.conf ?
-- other ?
>>
>> I don't think we really discussed things at this level, and I
>> personally don't know enough about the current SR-IOV support to even
>> know what the possible strategies are. I think it's really up to the
>> person doing the implementation to figure out what makes sense given
>> the constraints of the SR-IOV specs and the current Linux support.
>>
>> Bjorn
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-29 7:28 PCI mini-summit notes Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-29 15:48 ` Jiang Liu
2012-08-29 22:44 ` Jon Mason
2012-08-29 22:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-30 6:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-05 1:33 ` Don Dutile
2012-09-05 1:41 ` Don Dutile [this message]
2012-09-03 8:51 ` Ram Pai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5046ADDC.8090707@redhat.com \
--to=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).