From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] PCI/IOV: simplify code by hotplug safe pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot()
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:02:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505BAEAE.4040804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo58sSCPYF9Ug-o-f3odJovECkdxPOoahx9+Ob6kmP_srw@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/21/2012 07:59 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Following code has a race window between pci_find_bus() and pci_get_slot()
>>> if PCI hotplug operation happens between them which removes the pci_bus.
>>> So use PCI hotplug safe interface pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() instead,
>>> which also reduces code complexity.
>>>
>>> struct pci_bus *pci_bus = pci_find_bus(domain, busno);
>>> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = pci_get_slot(pci_bus, devfn);
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/iov.c | 8 ++------
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> index aeccc91..b0fe771 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
>>> @@ -152,15 +152,11 @@ failed1:
>>> static void virtfn_remove(struct pci_dev *dev, int id, int reset)
>>> {
>>> char buf[VIRTFN_ID_LEN];
>>> - struct pci_bus *bus;
>>> struct pci_dev *virtfn;
>>> struct pci_sriov *iov = dev->sriov;
>>>
>>> - bus = pci_find_bus(pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), virtfn_bus(dev, id));
>>> - if (!bus)
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - virtfn = pci_get_slot(bus, virtfn_devfn(dev, id));
>>> + virtfn = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(pci_domain_nr(dev->bus),
>>> + virtfn_bus(dev, id), virtfn_devfn(dev, id));
>>> if (!virtfn)
>>> return;
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This one cause IOV regression, when remove bridge with pci devices under that.
>>
>> in that case, VFs are stopped before PF, so they are not in device
>> tree anymore.
>> so pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot will not find those VFs.
>>
>> So the reference to PF is not released. Also vit_bus may not be released too.
>>
>> So you have to rework
>> pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot to make it work on pci devices get stopped only.
>>
>> or just drop this from the tree.
>
> pci_find_bus() is a broken interface (because there's no reference
> counting or safety with respect to hot-plug), and if the design
> depends on it, that means the design is broken, too. I don't think
> reworking pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() is the right answer.
>
> It's not clear to me why we need the split between stopping and
> removing devices. That split leads to these zombie devices that have
> been stopped and are no longer findable by bus_find_device() (which is
> used by pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot()), but still "exist" in some
> fashion until they're removed. It's unreasonable for random PCI and
> driver code to have to worry about that zombie state.
>
> I'll revert this patch for now to fix the regression. Of course, that
> means we will still have the old problem of using the unsafe
> pci_find_bus().
Hi Bjorn,
I'm working on to enhance unsafe calling of pci_find_bus().
--Gerry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 15:43 [PATCH 0/5] Simplify code by using hotplug safe pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI/IA64: simplify code by " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI/vga: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI/cpcihp: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI/IOV: " Jiang Liu
2012-09-20 20:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-20 23:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-21 0:02 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-09-21 1:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-21 2:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-21 6:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-21 14:15 ` Don Dutile
2012-09-21 15:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI/xen-pcifront: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 16:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-28 23:56 ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-05 16:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-05 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-17 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/5] Simplify code by using " Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505BAEAE.4040804@gmail.com \
--to=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).