From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>, <yinghai@kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
<mihailm@parallels.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Improve container_notify_cb() to support container hot-remove.
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:47:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50889A14.9030607@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5088967E.3060204@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 2012-10-25 9:31, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Toshi,
>
> On 10/25/2012 01:14 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 14:05 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> +static int container_device_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret;
>>> + struct acpi_eject_event *ej_event;
>>> +
>>> + /* stop container device at first */
>>> + ret = acpi_bus_trim(device, 0);
>>
>> Hi Tang,
>>
>> Why do you need to call acpi_bus_trim(device,0) to stop the container
>> device first?
>
> This issue was introduced by Lu Yinghai, I think he could give a better
> answer than me. :)
> Please refer to the following url:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg17667.html
>
> However, this is not applied into the pci tree yet.
We have worked out a patch set to clean up the logic for PCI/ACPI binding
relationship. It updates PCI/ACPI binding relationship by registering bus
notification onto pci_bus_type instead of hooking into the ACPI/glue.c.
To accommodate that patch set, the ACPI device destroy process has been
split into two steps:
1) acpi_bus_trim(device,0) to unbind ACPI drivers
2) acpi_bus_trim(device,1) to destroy ACPI devices
>
>>
>>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "acpi_bus_trim stop return %x\n", ret);
>>
>> Do you need this message in the normal case? If so, I'd suggest to use
>> pr_debug().
>>
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + /* event originated from ACPI eject notification */
>>> + device->flags.eject_pending = 1;
>>
>> You do not need to set the eject_pending flag when the handler calls
>> acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(). It was set before because the handler did
>> not initiate the hot-remove operation.
>
> I just set it to keep the logic the same as before.
> And thanks for telling me this. :)
>
>>
> ...
>>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Container driver received %s event\n",
>>> + "ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST");
>>
>> Same as other comment. Suggest to use pr_debug().
>
> OK. :)
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + if (!present || ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !device)
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + result = container_device_remove(device);
>>> + if (result) {
>>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to remove container\n");
>>
>> Please use pr_warn().
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Toshi
>>
>>> + break;
>>> }
>>> - break;
>>> +
>>> + return;
>>>
>>> default:
>>> /* non-hotplug event; possibly handled by other handler */
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-24 6:05 [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: container hot remove support Tang Chen
2012-10-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Use kacpi_hotplug_wq to handle container hotplug event Tang Chen
2012-10-24 6:54 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-24 7:24 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-24 8:09 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-24 7:42 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-24 6:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Improve container_notify_cb() to support container hot-remove Tang Chen
2012-10-24 17:14 ` Toshi Kani
2012-10-24 18:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-10-25 0:53 ` Jiang Liu
2012-10-25 1:31 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-25 1:47 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2012-10-25 17:20 ` Toshi Kani
2012-10-26 5:43 ` Tang Chen
2012-10-26 20:02 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50889A14.9030607@huawei.com \
--to=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mihailm@parallels.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).