From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Ian Abbott <ian.abbott@mev.co.uk>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: add workaround for PLX PCI 9050 bug
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:01:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508F8969.8030309@mev.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo7mOxU=5u_-kehBnPU0Hr0thY8uZk6CXvp3kUbaqgKs7g@mail.gmail.com>
On 30/10/12 03:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> wrote:
>> The PLX PCI 9050 PCI Target bridge controller has a bug that prevents
>> its local configuration registers being read through BAR0 (memory) or
>> BAR1 (i/o) if the base address lies on an odd 128-byte boundary, i.e. if
>> bit 7 of the base address is non-zero. This bug is described in the PCI
>> 9050 errata list, version 1.4, May 2005. It was fixed in the
>> pin-compatible PCI 9052, which can be distinguished from the PCI 9050 by
>> checking the revision in the PCI header, which is hard-coded for these
>> chips.
>>
>> Workaround the problem by re-allocating the affected regions to a
>> 256-byte boundary. Note that BAR0 and/or BAR1 may have been disabled
>> (size 0) during initialization of the PCI chip when its configuration is
>> read from a serial EEPROM.
>>
>> Currently, the fix-up has only been used for devices with the default
>> vendor and device ID of the PLX PCI 9050. The PCI 9052 shares the same
>> default device ID as the PCI 9050 but they have different PCI revision
>> codes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/quirks.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> index 7a451ff..7e6be56 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> @@ -1790,6 +1790,31 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TOSHIBA_2,
>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_TOSHIBA_TC86C001_IDE,
>> quirk_tc86c001_ide);
>>
>> +/*
>> + * PLX PCI 9050 PCI Target bridge controller has an errata that prevents the
>> + * local configuration registers accessible via BAR0 (memory) or BAR1 (i/o)
>> + * being read correctly if bit 7 of the base address is set.
>> + * The BAR0 or BAR1 region may be disabled (size 0) or enabled (size 128).
>> + * Re-allocate the regions to a 256-byte boundary if necessary.
>> + */
>> +static void __devinit quirk_plx_pci9050(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int bar;
>> +
>> + /* Fixed in revision 2 (PCI 9052). */
>> + if (dev->revision >= 2)
>> + return;
>> + for (bar = 0; bar <= 1; bar++)
>> + if (pci_resource_len(dev, bar) == 0x80 &&
>> + (pci_resource_start(dev, bar) & 0x80)) {
>> + struct resource *r = &dev->resource[bar];
>> + r->start = 0;
>> + r->end = 0xff;
>
> I assume the intent here is to make these BARs "unassigned" so they
> will be reassigned later? We don't yet have a clean generic way of
> indicating "unassigned," so "r->start = 0" is the best we can do for
> now.
I more-or-less copied the method from quirk_tc86c001_ide(). I don't
have any prior experience with writing PCI quirks, so I don't know if
this is the best way to do it! All I really care about is that these
BARs don't have bit 7 set.
> I think it'd be nice to have a dev_info() here to explain what's going
> on. Otherwise, the dmesg will be a bit mysterious.
OK, I'll add that in the next version of this patch.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-30 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 14:40 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: add workaround for PLX PCI 9050 bug Ian Abbott
2012-10-29 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: add PLX PCI 9050 workaround for some Meilhaus DAQ cards Ian Abbott
2012-10-30 3:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: add workaround for PLX PCI 9050 bug Bjorn Helgaas
2012-10-30 8:01 ` Ian Abbott [this message]
2012-10-30 11:03 ` Ian Abbott
2012-10-30 17:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-10-30 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Ian Abbott
2012-11-05 22:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508F8969.8030309@mev.co.uk \
--to=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ian.abbott@mev.co.uk \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).