Re: [RFD][PATCH 5/7] PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space

[Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>]

On 09/29/2012 05:55 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Define two device PM QoS flags, PM_QOS_FLAG_NO_POWER_OFF
> and PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP, and introduce routines
> dev_pm_qos_expose_flags() and dev_pm_qos_hide_flags() allowing the
> caller to expose those two flags to user space or to hide them
> from it, respectively.
> 
> After the flags have been exposed, user space will see two
> additional sysfs attributes, pm_qos_no_power_off and
> pm_qos_remote_wakeup, under the device's /sys/devices/.../power/
> directory.  Then, writing 1 to one of them will update the
> PM QoS flags request owned by user space so that the corresponding
> flag is requested to be set.  In turn, writing 0 to one of them
> will cause the corresponding flag in the user space's request to
> be cleared (however, the owners of the other PM QoS flags requests
> for the same device may still request the flag to be set and it
> may be effectively set even if user space doesn't request that).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-power |   31 ++++
>  drivers/base/power/power.h                    |    6 
>  drivers/base/power/qos.c                      |  169 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/base/power/sysfs.c                    |   95 +++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/pm.h                            |    1 
>  include/linux/pm_qos.h                        |   26 ++++
>  6 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> +++ linux/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  
>  #include "power.h"
>  
> @@ -322,6 +323,38 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_add_request);
>  
>  /**
> + * __dev_pm_qos_update_request - Modify an existing device PM QoS request.
> + * @req : PM QoS request to modify.
> + * @new_value: New value to request.
> + */
> +int __dev_pm_qos_update_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 new_value)
> +{
> +	s32 curr_value;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!req->dev->power.qos) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	switch(req->type) {
> +	case DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY:
> +		curr_value = req->data.pnode.prio;
> +		break;
> +	case DEV_PM_QOS_FLAGS:
> +		curr_value = req->data.flr.flags;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (curr_value != new_value)
> +		ret = apply_constraint(req, PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, new_value);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * dev_pm_qos_update_request - modifies an existing qos request
>   * @req : handle to list element holding a dev_pm_qos request to use
>   * @new_value: defines the qos request
> @@ -336,11 +369,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_add_request
>   * -EINVAL in case of wrong parameters, -ENODEV if the device has been
>   * removed from the system
>   */
> -int dev_pm_qos_update_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
> -			      s32 new_value)
> +int dev_pm_qos_update_request(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, s32 new_value)
>  {
> -	s32 curr_value;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!req) /*guard against callers passing in null */
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -350,29 +381,9 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_request(struct dev
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
> -
> -	if (!req->dev->power.qos) {
> -		ret = -ENODEV;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	switch(req->type) {
> -	case DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY:
> -		curr_value = req->data.pnode.prio;
> -		break;
> -	case DEV_PM_QOS_FLAGS:
> -		curr_value = req->data.flr.flags;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (curr_value != new_value)
> -		ret = apply_constraint(req, PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, new_value);
> -
> - out:
> +	__dev_pm_qos_update_request(req, new_value);

You forgot to assign the return value here.

Thanks,
Aaron

>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_update_request);
> @@ -533,10 +544,19 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request(stru
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_add_ancestor_request);